Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan Kühn/Check Wikipedia

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
Automatische Archivierung
Auf dieser Seite werden Abschnitte automatisch archiviert, deren jüngster Beitrag mehr als 60 Tage zurückliegt und die mindestens 2 signierte Beiträge enthalten.
Archivübersicht Archiv

2008

2009

2010

2011

Wie wird ein Archiv angelegt?

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Script "Reference double" (Error number 78)[Bearbeiten]

Hallo Stefan, look at article ru:Чемпионат Европы по лёгкой атлетике 2006. I think it will better if script found two references between div and /div tags when they appear. In case of presence div tags it is not necessary to designate error, if refereces less than two between div and/div tags --Askakun 00:54, 16. Okt. 2009 (CEST)

<syntaxhighlight>[Bearbeiten]

Some errors such as #010 can recognize <source> tags as exception and don't include in the reports, but can't recognize <syntaxhighlight> tags, which is synonym for <source>. Could you please add it as exception? --fryed-peach 09:29, 25. Sep. 2009 (CEST)

ISBN (069)[Bearbeiten]

[1] Probably in thumb|220px|(...) . Dont check inside [[Image:[^\|\]]* Rjclaudio (Talk) 17:25, 26. Sep. 2009 (CEST)

Two ideas[Bearbeiten]

Hi! I've two ideas for your script.

  1. A new error for detect the HTML tag <a ...> and substitute it with [[...]] as is for error 038 (<i> with ''...'') and error 026 (<b> with '''...''').
  2. In error 069 "ISBN wrong syntax" can check also for "ISBN: nnnnnn"; with the colon don't work the Special:BookSources

What do you think, they're useful? --Beta16 17:11, 30. Sep. 2009 (CEST)

Titel mit Sonderzeichen und ohne SORTIERUNG[Bearbeiten]

Da schlagen auch Weiterleitungen, die nicht kategorisiert sind auf. Ist das sinnvoll ? --Varina 11:03, 6. Feb. 2010 (CET)

WikiCleaner[Bearbeiten]

Proposition for more configuration per Wikipedia[Bearbeiten]

Hi again.

A user asked me to automatically add links to error description in the comments when an error has been fixed with WikiCleaner. I thought about this on how to make it work with several Wikipedia without needing to add many configuration into my own tool. My idea is to complete the file you're using for the translations with more properties that you won't use but that I can use. For example, if the fr project wants to have links to the description of error 6, they would add a line error_006_link_frwiki=P:CS/006 END in the file for traductions.

This principle could be extended for letting projects have more control on the fix proposed by automatic tools (or even for configuring your own detections). For example, on the fr wiki, they suggest to fix error 56 (Link to other language) by using the template lien, so they could add error_056_model_frwiki=Lien END in the traduction file, and my own tool (or other tools) could read this to propose a fix adapted to the wiki.

What do you think of this suggestions ? --NicoV 00:21, 8. Apr. 2010 (CEST)

ISBN-10 and ISBN-13 templates on en.wiki[Bearbeiten]

En.wiki has these two templates for use when you need to specify the format of an ISBN number. (I have no idea when you'd really need to do that, but the templates exist.) The syntax looks like this:

{{ISBN-10|1234567890}}
{{ISBN-13|1234567890123}}

These seem to be getting flagged as invalid ISBN syntax, but they are a valid use. Can the software be changed so that it considers these correct? Thanks. --Auntof6 08:00, 17. Jun. 2010 (CEST)

Project filter[Bearbeiten]

Is there a way to filter all errors in a contry, by project ? (all errors, detailled in the 3 level priority, table and interface, etc, etc...). useless to argue, i suppose you can understand why it should be better...

I think it would be usuful, i don't know hard it is to or even if it is possible to do this but...

What do you think of this, or could you consider think about it ? --Arcade Padawan 21:15, 30. Jun. 2010 (CEST)

"show only new problems"[Bearbeiten]

Thanks for great tool! But is it possible to add option "show only new problems"? It will enable users to tell sb that (s)he should be more careful in editing wikipedia. And again: THANKS! -- Bulwersator 23:07, 21. Jul. 2010 (CEST) [2]

Links in headlines[Bearbeiten]

Hello. Many thanks for providing this tool! It is absolutely useful, but I have one request. I'd like to find out any links in headlines like "=== [[foo]] ===", which should be avoided because of en:Wikipedia:Manual of Style (accessibility)#Links (#3) in enwp and ja:WP:MOS#見出し in jawp (my home wiki). Is it possible to add a feature to detect this? Thanks in advance. --Penn Station 17:36, 25. Jul. 2010 (CEST)

"{{CURRENT" used in articles[Bearbeiten]

Hello. I'd like to find "{{CURRENT" (e.g. {{CURRENTYEAR}}, {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}}, {{CURRENTYEAR-JST}}, et al.) that is used in articles, not in templates. Especially when they are in headline, difficult to find out. I believe they usually should be avoided in articles (article namespace) because of accuracy in the future. Is it possible to add a feature to detect them? Thanks in advance. --Penn Station 08:29, 28. Jul. 2010 (CEST)


Asterisks (*) inside of brackets[Bearbeiten]

Leading asterisks inside of brackets are being treated as though the brackets are not there. This causes the internal link to be broken down into a list. Trailing asterisks are left alone. In other words, templates with codes like this:

<span class="plainlinks">This {{pagetype|subjectspace=yes}} was [{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|diff=cur}} last edited] by [[User:{{REVISIONUSER}}|{{REVISIONUSER}}]] {{Toolbar|[[User talk:{{REVISIONUSER}}|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/{{REVISIONUSER}}|contribs]]}} {{time ago|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}}}}. <font size="1">''([{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAMEE}}|action=purge}} Purge])''</font></span><noinclude>{{documentation}}</noinclude>

Turn out looking like this:

  • This template was last edited by [[User:
  • Kat*|
  • Kat*]] ([[User talk:
  • Kat*|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/
  • Kat*|contribs]]) 0 seconds ago. (Purge)

I believe the problem is in the REVISIONUSER command. Because when I replace REVISIONUSER with ~~~ the template works as intended.--*Kat* 07:39, 29. Jul. 2010 (CEST)

False positive on error 67 (reference after punctuation)[Bearbeiten]

Hi Stefan,

When the reference is after an abbreviation (like etc.), the error 67 is raised, but it shouldn't because the '.' is not really a punctuation but is part of the abbreviation. Would it be possible to have a list of abbreviations for each wikipedia that shouldn't raise an error 67 ? In the French wikipedia, we have added the parameter error_067_abbreviations_frwiki in the translation page for this list, and I have implemented this rule in Wiki Cleaner.

Thanks in advance. --NicoV 20:11, 8. Aug. 2010 (CEST)

Problem with Astrocat[Bearbeiten]

Problem with Astrocat template. --Pessimist2006 10:42, 10. Aug. 2010 (CEST)

Leere Parameter in Vorlagen und anderes[Bearbeiten]

  • Vorschlag für den Test auf groß geschriebene Überschrift: Prüfe nicht die Gesamtlänge sondern die Länge der Wörter. Besteht die groß geschriebene Überschrift nur aus 4-buchstabigen oder kürzeren Wörtern, ist sie in Ordnung, sonst nicht.
  • Es gäbe sicher unzählige Möglichkeiten, was man noch bei Vorlagen prüfen könnte. Ein leicht prüfbares Detail ist mir neulich aufgefallen: Leere Parameter in Vorlagen können Absicht sein, z.B. in {{Beispiel|a||c|d=e}} (3 unbenannte und 1 benannter Parameter, der zweite unbenannte ist leer). Wenn die Vorlage allerdings nur benannte Parameter enthält, z.B. {{Beispiel
    |a = b|
    |c = d
    }}
    , dann kann man sicher davon ausgehen, dass die doppelten Striche (mit Leerraum dazwischen) überflüssig sind (Priorität „low“). Auch {{Beispiel||||d=e}} wäre unnötig weil gleichbedeutend mit {{Beispiel|d=e}}. Fehler sind das deshalb, weil diese leeren Parameter u.a. in der Vorlagenauswertung auftauchen.
  • Ich hätte so gern die Top 100. :-)

--TMg 02:04, 11. Sep. 2010 (CEST)

„ISBN:“ - Erkennung[Bearbeiten]

ISBN: 1234... werden nicht als fehlerhaft aussortiert, sind aber falsch. Ist das Absicht? Gruß --RonMeier 22:52, 29. Okt. 2010 (CEST)

Disable scanning for new articles[Bearbeiten]

Is there any chance to exclude new articles from the scan list on Turkish Wikipedia? Most of the new articles are getting deleted and these are listed in the dump, so we need this issue resolved. --Superyetkin 21:21, 7. Nov. 2010 (CET)

false "Template not correct begin"[Bearbeiten]

Hallo! The bot found an error (http://toolserver.org/~sk/cgi-bin/checkwiki/checkwiki.cgi?project=ruwiki&view=only&id=47), but the template ({{ambox|...}} in 8 lines) is correct. Danke.-- Crower 14:48, 24. Feb. 2011 (CET)

Double bracket on it.wiki[Bearbeiten]

Onto it.wiki, there is a double bracket closed but not opened. The tool line is:

ASCII   edit    ]]

I don't find it, is a false positive?

Yesterday there was this code (see it in the edit page)

[[Bracket|[]]

and I've substituted it with

[[Parentesi quadra|[]]

I don't know if it cause again a problem.

Maybe you should skip the "nowiki" tag. Bye Jalo 09:17, 23. Mär. 2011 (CET)

Fehler bei ID: 5 (Undefiniertes Ende bei Kommentar)[Bearbeiten]

Das Problem bei diesem Fehler ist, dass Notice als Ausschnitt des Fehlers logischerweise ein <!-- enthält. Leider verschwinden dann die restlichen Tabellenelemente und der Fehler kann nicht mehr als erledigt markiert werden. Die Zeichen < und > sollten daher escaped und die <nowiki>(!?) entfernt werden.

Quelltext an der betroffenen Stelle:

<td class="table" style="background-color:#D0F5A9"><nowiki><!-- (1924–2001), deutscher Generalleutnant</nowiki></td>

Grüße -- chatterDisk 03:29, 17. Apr. 2011 (CEST)

New type: Wikilinks formatted as external link[Bearbeiten]

It seems to me that many errors of the type External link with two brackets (ID 86) are in fact links to other Wikipedia pages, such as [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example]] . If adding a new type is not too troublesome I'd appreciate a separation between real external links and wrongly formatted internal links. I see that these errors are solved by bots anyway, but are the bots clever enough to reformat internal links properly? -- Nilli 20:50, 29. Apr. 2011 (CEST)

< chars in notice column[Bearbeiten]

the notice field on: http://toolserver.org/~sk/cgi-bin/checkwiki/checkwiki.cgi?project=svwiki&view=detail

isn't converting "<" to "<", so the webbrowser thinks it html and hide it :-( -- Puggan 17:46, 1. Mai 2011 (CEST) (sv:puggan)

Check Wikipedia - ID:5[Bearbeiten]

Hello; I found a little problem in this particular case: ID:5, (comment not close) impossible to set "done". (see this link: [3]). Thanks! -- Speculos 08:53, 7. Jun. 2011 (CEST)

DEFAULTSORT and references: special case for eswiki[Bearbeiten]

Hello. In eswiki, in some pages we use the following templates:

  • {{BD|nnnn|nnnn|Xxxx xxx}} instead of {{DEFAULTSORT:Xxxx xxx}} or {{ORDENAR:Xxxx xxx}}
  • {{listaref}} instead of <references />

Could you add those special cases to your tool? It will cut eswiki's reported issues a lot... Thanks. --es:Usuario:Angus 19:17, 17. Jun. 2011 (CEST)

Link to other wiki[Bearbeiten]

Is it possible to split link to other wiki into "link into file namespace of other wiki" and "link into namespace, other than file namespace of other wiki"? Bulwersator 15:13, 10. Sep. 2011 (CEST)

Error #3 in it.wiki[Bearbeiten]

I think a fix is needed: in [4] error #3 is empty (or almost empty), but when I check an article for other errors, I found a lot of false positives for #3, where instead of <reference/> is {{References}} (correct, even not recommended) or {{References|#}} (correct, where # is a parameter for disposing references on columns). AttoRenato 12:36, 11. Sep. 2011 (CEST)

#75[Bearbeiten]

"The article had a list, where one line is indent (:* text). A list don't need an intend with ":". Use more "*" to indent the list."

This is not exactly true.

Example 1:

    • Adding an extra * does not indent a bullet list it puts the bullet list inside another bullet list.

Example 2:

  • To indent a bullet list you need to add a : same as when identing other text.

It is true that :* is often used when ** is better syntax. But the following is a correct way to indent an entire list:

:*
:*

I think the tool should only report :* on lines following lines starting with *. Like:

* 
:* 

90.229.129.137 20:25, 20. Sep. 2011 (CEST)

Die Seiten mit fehlendem References-Tag sind umgezogen[Bearbeiten]

von: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategorie:Seiten_mit_fehlendem_References-Tag
nach: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategorie:Wikipedia:Seite_mit_fehlendem_References-Tag

Bitte auf der Seite Wikipedia → Homepage → dewiki → high priority → Referenz-Tag fehlt einpflegen. Danke --RonMeier 12:43, 20. Okt. 2011 (CEST)

Suggestion: split error 68 into several sub-categories[Bearbeiten]

Splitting error 68 into several sub-categories would ease the manual correction work.

So far, I've identified 3 cases that typically need to be handled in different ways:

  • Simple link to corresponding page in another language (same as those inter-language links in the left column). Such a link is often mentioned instead of proper sourcing when (part of) the page results from translation from that other language: the correction then involves proper sourcing. When the page is in very early draft stage (almost no actual content yet), it may even make sense to delete the link altoghether after having checked that the standard inter-language link is available (left column).
  • Link to corresponding page in another language with an anchor to a specific place in that page. The best way to correct these seems to add content that is already available in the other language (e.g. through translation).
  • Link to page in another language that appearantly doesn't correspond to the currrent page (based on existing inter-language links). First one needs to verify that the target isn't indeed a corresponding page: if it is, then inter-language links should be made properly (e.g. not within the text...), otherwise correction may involve conversion into a specific template such as {{link-interwiki}} (English Wikipedia) or {{lien}} (French Wikipedia) to have links to both the "page to create" in local language and the existing page in the other language.

--Klipe 10:24, 21. Okt. 2011 (CEST)

#36 now partially done by AWB[Bearbeiten]

AWB since revision 7900 removes carriage return inside redirects. -- Magioladitis 21:43, 2. Jan. 2012 (CET)

ID 47[Bearbeiten]

Der Fehler in Farchant gemäß Liste kann nicht nachvollzogen werden. Liegt es daran, dass die Vorlageneinbindung auskommentiert ist, oder liegt es an mir? --TeesJ 19:33, 16. Jan. 2012 (CET)

Toolserver ID 89[Bearbeiten]

Hallo Stefan, zu der Toolserver ID 89 (Sortierung mit Großbuchstaben im Wort) müsste eine Anpassung stattfinden, bzw. müsste diese ID deaktiviert werden, da die Software die Großbuchstaben zwischenzeitlich schon umwandelt. Man hatte mich dazu auf meiner Diskussionsseite angesprochen und die entsprechende Softwareneuerung als Link mitgeliefert. mfg --Crazy1880 19:15, 21. Sep. 2012 (CEST)

Error #45 (Interwiki duplication) now handled better by AWB[Bearbeiten]

AWB as of rev 8430 fixes interwikis with duplicated double dots, removes duplicated interwikis independently of the first letter casing, removes duplicated interwikis even if they have comments next to them (not removing them was a bug). These changes fix most of the unfixed cases we had on the list. -- Magioladitis (Diskussion) 16:17, 25. Sep. 2012 (CEST)

False positive for Error #13 in enwiki[Bearbeiten]

en:Wikipedia:Text editor support is a false positive. -- Magioladitis (Diskussion) 14:17, 10. Okt. 2012 (CEST)

cswiki[Bearbeiten]

Hallo! Some bugs found:

  • false positive for #34 – 6 articles; (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; the script thinks that sequence "{{{" means parameter of a template; {{#tag:ref| }} isn't error because ref tag can't be inside of another ref tag),
  • false positive for #56 – arrows are checked even they are in the line starting with a space(s); once, sequence "=>" was detected, but the "=" meant a content of a parameter and the ">" meant "greater than" before a digit ({{temp|first=>20}}),
  • false positive for #58 – 1 article, cs:Simson (detected, but there are "/" within the heading),
  • false positives for #65 – 4 articles,
  • if the name of the article with error includes "&", clicking on "edit" directs you to the article whose name is a text before "&".

Thanks for reading and fixing. Matěj Suchánek (Beiträge | cs) 14:42, 15. Nov. 2012 (CET)

False positive on error 46 (Square brackets not correct begin)[Bearbeiten]

False positive is at Mumtaz Ali on enwiki 16:17, 28 January 2013.

False positive text from Check Wikipedia → Homepage → enwiki → high priority → Square brackets not correct begin is:

Mumtaz Ali edit    to Dilli se Dulhan laya re song from Jhula [1942]]      more    2013-01-28 00:31:49     Done

corresponding wikitext uses HTML escape codes and I think should therefore be correct:

to Dilli se Dulhan laya re song from Jhula &#91;1942&#93;]

Please contact me on English Wikipedia if you need any more details (I doubt there's anything else I can tell you). Many apologies if I have not followed instructions as I find it hard to follow German. Thanks for your understanding. --MegaSloth (Diskussion) 21:52, 28. Jan. 2013 (CET)

Special letters at svwiki[Bearbeiten]

Swedish Wikipedia recently changed sorting algorithm so that most special letters are sorted correctly. This means that áàâãéèêëčňřšž and many other letters can be used in DEFAULTSORT. I think Checkwiki ID=6 (DEFAULTSORT with special characters) and ID=37 (DEFAULTSORT missing for titles with special letters) for svwiki should be updated to only include non-letter special characters. 90.227.135.41 14:32, 16. Mär. 2013 (CET)

ID 37: Nach welchen Sonderzeichen wird gesucht?[Bearbeiten]

Hallo. ID 37 listet ja alle Artikel, die ein Sonderzeichen enthalten und keinen Sortierschlüssel (SORTIERUNG bzw. DEFAUlTSORT) enthalten. Arbeitet dein Script mit einer Positivliste (also: Liste alle Artikel ohne Sortierschlüssel, die ein äöüßéèá usw. im Lemma haben) oder mit einer Negativliste (also: Liste alle Artikel ohne Sortierschlüssel, die bis auf abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ weitere Zeichen im Lemma enthalten). Letzteres wäre denke ich genauer. Die Frage rührt daher, da ich manche Lemma in der Liste vermisse, die z.B. als Sonderzeichen nur einen Bindestrich (-), einen Gedankenstrich (–) oder einen Doppelpunkt (:) enthalten. Liebe Ostergrüße, --BlueCücü (Diskussion) 12:57, 30. Mär. 2013 (CET)

ID 28 false positives[Bearbeiten]

Error number 28, table not correct end, marks many road articles as errors when the tables are fine. Examples: [5], [6], [7]. The tables begin with the normal "{|" but instead of ending with "|}" they use Template:Jctbtm (or its redirects) or Template:LegendRJL. Along with adding more information to the table they also close it, so the articles are correct. The majority of articles listed under this error are road articles with this problem, clogging up the list. Is it possible for these articles to not be included in the list? Stj6 (Diskussion) 04:46, 3. Apr. 2013 (CEST)

Check Wikipedia - other templates which display references are includes as error #3[Bearbeiten]

Hi, As in title. Example for that type of template on Polish Wikipedia is {{Uwagi}} --Cysioland (Diskussion) 15:27, 3. Apr. 2013 (CEST)

ID 47 false positives[Bearbeiten]

Приветствую. Спасибо за ваш труд.

Проблема такова: происходит ложное срабатывание на шаблон [8]. Пример [9]. Не знаю в чем проблема, в скрипте или в шаблоне.

Я

Hi! Again detected error ID47. Script responds on "Е ====* {{NL|Королёв, Евгений}}" and "{{NL|Королёв, Владимир}}" . Here is an example of article[10]. Template correct. Probably problem occurs because of use vertical separator/pipe.

Errors not generated and other suggestions[Bearbeiten]

Hi! It seems that some errors even if they are switched on are not generated. These are: partialy #2 (<br>), #4 (weblink and no headline), #9 (more categories at one line), #22 (category with space), #35 (image in gallery without description), #87 (entities without semicolon).

Do we still need #3? Articles with <ref> and without <references /> are in system-generated-category defined via MediaWiki:Cite error refs without references.

Error #64 should not be generated only for links like [[foo|foo]] but also for [[Foo|foo]] or [[foo|Foo]].

#34 (programming templates and parser functions): "{{tag:ref|" is not error if it is found within <ref></ref>.

With arrival of Wikidata, we will never need errors #45, #51 and #53. What about substituting them with error which generates articles with interwiki links?

Mach's gut! Matěj Suchánek (Beiträge | cs) 13:22, 13. Apr. 2013 (CEST)

ID 47 -Vorlagenbeginn nicht korrekt[Bearbeiten]

seit einiger Zeit funktioniert das nicht richtig, es werden mehr Fehler angezeigt als vorhanden. (siehe aktuelle Liste "Liste der Straßen und Plätze in Berlin-Karlshorst") Gruß --RonMeier (Diskussion) 21:57, 17. Apr. 2013 (CEST)

Bot error (wave from en wiki)[Bearbeiten]

"Different number of [[ and ]] brackets. If it is sourcecode then use <source> or <code>."

This generates a false positive when editors use a --- to place a horizontal rule inside a photo caption. Early Middle Ages on en.wiki 173.21.13.211 20:33, 11. Mai 2013 (CEST)

JSONP api[Bearbeiten]

It would be cool if a jsonp API would be availble to check wikipedia tool.

For example dablinks have json API, that allows integrating the tool to the wiki interface with gadget/script (simplified version below)

$.getJSON('//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py?lang=he&format=json&callback=?', {
            page: wgPageName
        }, function (res) {
                if (!res || !res.query || !res.query.pages || res.query.pages.length == 0 || res.query.pages[0] == null) alert('no disabmigs');
                else alert('you should fix disambigs');
        }
}

Thanks, Eran (Diskussion) 22:54, 8. Jul. 2013 (CEST)

Deleted page keeps coming up in Check Wikipedia[Bearbeiten]

Hi!

The deleted page sv:Gëzim Gashi keeps showing up here even since its deleted months ago. I even tried to defaultsort the talkpage if thats the error but that didnt help. What could be wrong? /Hangsna (Diskussion) 22:12, 29. Jul. 2013 (CEST)

False positive in error 056 (ASCII arrows)[Bearbeiten]

For example in it:4 Ursae Majoris b the template value begins with a ">", the assignment operator is "=" and the result seems to an ASCII arrow. --Sbisolo (Diskussion) 12:01, 20. Feb. 2014 (CET)

Error No. (3) in Arabic Wekepedia[Bearbeiten]

Hello, There is a new reflist tag that is not listed in the system, this tag is {مراجع}. I have got the first 10500 article from the tool list, and run a Bot to search for the reflist, however i didnt find any problem, but the tool still list them with error no. 3 due to none update of ref tags. Thanks Hassen Houssein (nicht signierter Beitrag von Hassen.Houssein (Diskussion | Beiträge) 13:47, 23. Feb. 2014‎)

The translation at ar:ويكيبيديا:فحص ويكيبيديا/ترجمة does contain the template. Unfortunately the original Check Wikipedia source code on the Toolserver still uses a hard coded list of templates which doesn't contain the new template and is unlikely to change in the near future. You can use the new Check Wiki version on Tool Labs instead. --TMg 23:19, 25. Feb. 2014 (CET)

DEFAULTSORT missing (it.wiki)[Bearbeiten]

We have some false positives for "DEFAULTSORT missing for titles with special letters". Pages using it:Template:Bio don't need DEFAULTSORT because the template already adds this magic word. --Rotpunkt (Diskussion) 22:07, 1. Jun. 2014 (CEST)