„Intrinsisch ungeordnete Proteine“ – Versionsunterschied

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
[ungesichtete Version][ungesichtete Version]
Inhalt gelöscht Inhalt hinzugefügt
added a new entry in the table of the "de novo predictors of intrinsically unstructured proteins" together with the corresponding reference and URL
RDBrown (Diskussion | Beiträge)
→Cite journal with Wikipedia template filling, tweak cites, links out, inline refs
Zeile 5: Zeile 5:
==Biological role of intrinsic disorder==
==Biological role of intrinsic disorder==


Many disordered proteins have the binding affinity with their receptors regulated by [[post-translational modification]], thus it has been proposed that the flexibility of disordered proteins facilitates the different conformational requirements for binding the modifying enzymes as well as their receptors. Intrinsic disorder is particularly enriched in proteins implicated in cell signaling, transcription and chromatin remodeling functions [[#References|(Sandhu, 2009)]].
Many disordered proteins have the binding affinity with their receptors regulated by [[post-translational modification]], thus it has been proposed that the flexibility of disordered proteins facilitates the different conformational requirements for binding the modifying enzymes as well as their receptors. Intrinsic disorder is particularly enriched in proteins implicated in cell signaling, transcription and chromatin remodeling functions.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Sandhu KS |title=Intrinsic disorder explains diverse nuclear roles of chromatin remodeling proteins |journal=J. Mol. Recognit. |volume=22 |issue=1 |pages=1–8 |year=2009 |pmid=18802931 |doi=10.1002/jmr.915 }}</ref>


===Flexible linkers===
===Flexible linkers===
Zeile 11: Zeile 11:


===Coupled folding and binding===
===Coupled folding and binding===
Many unstructured proteins undergo transitions to more ordered states upon binding to their targets. The coupled folding and binding may be local, involving only a few interacting residues, or it might involve an entire protein domain. It was recently shown that the coupled folding and binding allows the burial of a large surface area that would only be possible for fully structured proteins if they were much larger [[#References|(Gunasekaran et al., 2003)]]. Moreover, certain disordered regions might serve as "molecular switches" in regulating certain biological function by switching to ordered conformation upon molecular recognition like small molecule-binding, DNA/RNA binding, ion interactions etc [[#References|(Sandhu & Dash., 2007)]].
Many unstructured proteins undergo transitions to more ordered states upon binding to their targets. The coupled folding and binding may be local, involving only a few interacting residues, or it might involve an entire protein domain. It was recently shown that the coupled folding and binding allows the burial of a large surface area that would only be possible for fully structured proteins if they were much larger.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Gunasekaran K, Tsai CJ, Kumar S, Zanuy D, Nussinov R |title=Extended disordered proteins: targeting function with less scaffold |journal=Trends Biochem. Sci. |volume=28 |issue=2 |pages=81–5 |year=2003 |month=February |pmid=12575995 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0968000403000033}}</ref> Moreover, certain disordered regions might serve as "molecular switches" in regulating certain biological function by switching to ordered conformation upon molecular recognition like small molecule-binding, DNA/RNA binding, ion interactions etc.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Sandhu KS, Dash D |title=Dynamic alpha-helices: conformations that do not conform |journal=Proteins |volume=68 |issue=1 |pages=109–22 |year=2007 |month=July |pmid=17407165 |doi=10.1002/prot.21328}}</ref>


The ability of disordered proteins to bind, and thus to exert a function, shows that stability is not a required condition.
The ability of disordered proteins to bind, and thus to exert a function, shows that stability is not a required condition.
Zeile 30: Zeile 30:


==''De novo'' prediction of intrinsically unstructured proteins==
==''De novo'' prediction of intrinsically unstructured proteins==
Computational methods exploit the sequence signatures of disorder to predict whether a protein is disordered given its amino acid sequence. The table below, which was originally adapted from [[#References|(Ferron et al., 2006)]] and has been recently updated, shows the main features of software for disorder prediction. Note that different software use different definitions of disorder.
Computational methods exploit the sequence signatures of disorder to predict whether a protein is disordered given its amino acid sequence. The table below, which was originally adapted from<ref>{{cite journal |author=Ferron F, Longhi S, Canard B, Karlin D |title=A practical overview of protein disorder prediction methods |journal=Proteins |volume=65 |issue=1 |pages=1–14 |year=2006 |month=October |pmid=16856179 |doi=10.1002/prot.21075}}</ref> and has been recently updated, shows the main features of software for disorder prediction. Note that different software use different definitions of disorder.


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Zeile 39: Zeile 39:
! Generates and uses multiple sequence alignment?
! Generates and uses multiple sequence alignment?
|-
|-
| PONDR [http://www.pondr.com]
| [http://www.pondr.com PONDR]
| All regions that are not rigid including random coils, partially unstructured regions, and molten globules
| All regions that are not rigid including random coils, partially unstructured regions, and molten globules
| Local aa composition, flexibility, hydropathy, etc
| Local aa composition, flexibility, hydropathy, etc
| No
| No
|-
|-
| SEG [http://mendel.imp.univie.ac.at/METHODS/seg.server.html]
| [http://mendel.imp.univie.ac.at/METHODS/seg.server.html SEG]
| Low-complexity segments that is, “simple sequences” or “compositionally biased regions”.
| Low-complexity segments that is, “simple sequences” or “compositionally biased regions”.
| Locally optimized low-complexity segments are produced at defined levels of stringency and then refined according to the equations of Wootton and Federhen
| Locally optimized low-complexity segments are produced at defined levels of stringency and then refined according to the equations of Wootton and Federhen
| No
| No
|-
|-
| Disopred2 [http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/disopred]
| [http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/disopred Disopred2]
| Regions devoid of ordered regular secondary structure
| Regions devoid of ordered regular secondary structure
| Cascaded support vector machine classifiers trained on PSI-BLAST profiles
| Cascaded support vector machine classifiers trained on PSI-BLAST profiles
| Yes
| Yes
|-
|-
| Globplot [http://globplot.embl.de]
| [http://globplot.embl.de Globplot]
| Regions with high propensity for globularity on the Russell/Linding scale (propensities for secondary structures and random coils)
| Regions with high propensity for globularity on the Russell/Linding scale (propensities for secondary structures and random coils)
| Russell/Linding scale of disorder
| Russell/Linding scale of disorder
| No
| No
|-
|-
| Disembl [http://dis.embl.de]
| [http://dis.embl.de Disembl]
| LOOPS (regions devoid of regular secondary structure); HOT LOOPS (highly mobile loops); REMARK465 (regions lacking electron density in crystal structure)
| LOOPS (regions devoid of regular secondary structure); HOT LOOPS (highly mobile loops); REMARK465 (regions lacking electron density in crystal structure)
| Neural networks trained on X-ray structure data
| Neural networks trained on X-ray structure data
| No
| No
|-
|-
| NORSp [http://cubic.bioc.columbia.edu/services/NORSp]
| [http://cubic.bioc.columbia.edu/services/NORSp NORSp]
| Regions with No Ordered Regular Secondary Structure (NORS). Most, but not all, are highly flexible.
| Regions with No Ordered Regular Secondary Structure (NORS). Most, but not all, are highly flexible.
| Secondary structure and solvent accessibility
| Secondary structure and solvent accessibility
| Yes
| Yes
|-
|-
| FoldIndex [http://bip.weizmann.ac.il/fldbin/findex]
| [http://bip.weizmann.ac.il/fldbin/findex FoldIndex]
| Regions that have a low hydrophobicity and high net charge (either loops or unstructured regions)
| Regions that have a low hydrophobicity and high net charge (either loops or unstructured regions)
| Charge/hydrophaty analyzed locally using a sliding window
| Charge/hydrophaty analyzed locally using a sliding window
| No
| No
|-
|-
| Charge/hydropathy method.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Uversky VN, Gillespie JR, Fink AL |title=Why are "natively unfolded" proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? |journal=Proteins |volume=41 |issue=3 |pages=415–27 |year=2000 |month=November |pmid=11025552 |doi=10.1002/1097-0134(20001115)41:3<415::AID-PROT130>3.0.CO;2-7}}</ref>
| Charge/hydropathy method. See [[#References|(Uversky et al., 2000)]].
| Fully unstructured domains (random coils)
| Fully unstructured domains (random coils)
| Global sequence composition
| Global sequence composition
| No
| No
|-
|-
| HCA (Hydrophobic Cluster Analysis) [http://smi.snv.jussieu.fr/hca/hca-seq.html]
| [http://smi.snv.jussieu.fr/hca/hca-seq.html HCA] (Hydrophobic Cluster Analysis)
| Hydrophobic clusters, which tend to form secondary structure elements
| Hydrophobic clusters, which tend to form secondary structure elements
| Helical visualization of amino acid sequence
| Helical visualization of amino acid sequence
| No
| No
|-
|-
| PreLink [http://genomics.eu.org]
| [http://genomics.eu.org PreLink]
| Regions that are expected to be unstructured in all conditions, regardless of the presence of a binding partner
| Regions that are expected to be unstructured in all conditions, regardless of the presence of a binding partner
| Compositional bias and low hydrophobic cluster content.
| Compositional bias and low hydrophobic cluster content.
| No
| No
|-
|-
| IUPred [http://iupred.enzim.hu]
| [http://iupred.enzim.hu IUPred]
| Regions that lack a well-defined 3D-structure under native conditions
| Regions that lack a well-defined 3D-structure under native conditions
| Energy resulting from inter-residue interactions, estimated from local amino acid composition
| Energy resulting from inter-residue interactions, estimated from local amino acid composition
| No
| No
|-
|-
| RONN [http://www.strubi.ox.ac.uk/RONN]
| [http://www.strubi.ox.ac.uk/RONN RONN]
| Regions that lack a well-defined 3D structure under native conditions
| Regions that lack a well-defined 3D structure under native conditions
| Bio-basis function neural network trained on disordered proteins
| Bio-basis function neural network trained on disordered proteins
| No
| No
|-
|-
| MD (Meta-Disorder predictor) [http://cubic.bioc.columbia.edu/services/md/]
| [http://cubic.bioc.columbia.edu/services/md/ MD] (Meta-Disorder predictor)
| Regions of different "types"; for example, unstructured loops and regions containing few stable intra-chain contacts
| Regions of different "types"; for example, unstructured loops and regions containing few stable intra-chain contacts
| A neural-network based meta-predictor that uses different sources of information predominantly obtained from orthogonal approaches
| A neural-network based meta-predictor that uses different sources of information predominantly obtained from orthogonal approaches
| Yes
| Yes
|-
|-
|GeneSilico Metadisorder [http://genesilico.pl/metadisorder/]
|[http://genesilico.pl/metadisorder/ GeneSilico Metadisorder]
|Regions that lack a well-defined 3D structure under native conditions (REMARK-465)
|Regions that lack a well-defined 3D structure under native conditions (REMARK-465)
|Meta method which uses other disorder predictors (like RONN, IUPred, POODLE and many more). Based on them the consensus is calculated according method accuracy (optimized using ANN, filtering and other techniques). Currently the best available method (first 2 places in last [[CASP]] experiment (blind test))
|Meta method which uses other disorder predictors (like RONN, IUPred, POODLE and many more). Based on them the consensus is calculated according method accuracy (optimized using ANN, filtering and other techniques). Currently the best available method (first 2 places in last [[CASP]] experiment (blind test))
|Yes
|Yes
|-
|-
|IUPforest-L [http://dmg.cs.rmit.edu.au/IUPforest/IUPforest-L.php]
|[http://dmg.cs.rmit.edu.au/IUPforest/IUPforest-L.php IUPforest-L]
|Long disordered regions in a set of proteins
|Long disordered regions in a set of proteins
|Moreau-Broto auto-correlation function of amino acid indices (AAIs[http://www.genome.ad.jp/dbget/aaindex.html])
|Moreau-Broto auto-correlation function of amino acid indices ([http://www.genome.ad.jp/dbget/aaindex.html AAIs])
|No
|No
|-
|-
|MFDp [http://biomine-ws.ece.ualberta.ca/MFDp.html]
|[http://biomine-ws.ece.ualberta.ca/MFDp.html MFDp]
|Different types of disorder including random coils, unstructured regions, molten globules, and REMARK-465-based regions.
|Different types of disorder including random coils, unstructured regions, molten globules, and REMARK-465-based regions.
|An ensemble of 3 SVMs specialized for the prediction of short, long and generic disordered regions, which combines three complementary disorder predictors, sequence, sequence profiles, predicted secondary structure, solvent accessibility, backbone dihedral torsion angles, residue flexibility and B-factors. MFDp (unofficially) secured 3rd place in last [[CASP]] experiment)
|An ensemble of 3 SVMs specialized for the prediction of short, long and generic disordered regions, which combines three complementary disorder predictors, sequence, sequence profiles, predicted secondary structure, solvent accessibility, backbone dihedral torsion angles, residue flexibility and B-factors. MFDp (unofficially) secured 3rd place in last [[CASP]] experiment)
Zeile 123: Zeile 123:


== References ==
== References ==
{{reflist}}


*"Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions", HJ Dyson & PE Wright, ''Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol.'' 2005 Mar;6(3):197-208. {{Entrez Pubmed|15738986}}
*{{cite journal |author=Dyson HJ, Wright PE |title=Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions |journal=Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. |volume=6 |issue=3 |pages=197–208 |year=2005 |month=March |pmid=15738986 |doi=10.1038/nrm1589}}
*{{cite journal |author=Dunker AK, Silman I, Uversky VN, Sussman JL |title=Function and structure of inherently disordered proteins |journal=Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. |volume=18 |issue=6 |pages=756–64 |year=2008 |month=December |pmid=18952168 |doi=10.1016/j.sbi.2008.10.002 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959-440X(08)00151-6}}

*{{cite journal |author=Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF, Jones DT |title=Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life |journal=J. Mol. Biol. |volume=337 |issue=3 |pages=635–45 |year=2004 |month=March |pmid=15019783 |doi=10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.002 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022283604001482}}
* A.K. Dunker, I. Silman, V.N. Uversky, J.L. Sussman, Function and structure of inherently disordered proteins, ''Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.'' 18:756-764, 2008. {{Entrez Pubmed|18952168}}
*{{cite journal |author=Iakoucheva LM, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Obradovi&#x107; Z, Dunker AK |title=Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins |journal=J. Mol. Biol. |volume=323 |issue=3 |pages=573–84 |year=2002 |month=October |pmid=12381310 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022283602009695}}

*{{cite journal |author=Collins MO, Yu L, Campuzano I, Grant SG, Choudhary JS |title=Phosphoproteomic analysis of the mouse brain cytosol reveals a predominance of protein phosphorylation in regions of intrinsic sequence disorder |journal=Mol. Cell Proteomics |volume=7 |issue=7 |pages=1331–48 |year=2008 |month=July |pmid=18388127 |doi=10.1074/mcp.M700564-MCP200 |url=http://www.mcponline.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=18388127}}
* Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF & Jones DT. Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. ''J. Mol. Biol.'' 337, 635–645, 2004.
*{{cite journal |author=Prilusky J, Felder CE, Zeev-Ben-Mordehai T, ''et al.'' |title=FoldIndex: a simple tool to predict whether a given protein sequence is intrinsically unfolded |journal=Bioinformatics |volume=21 |issue=16 |pages=3435–8 |year=2005 |month=August |pmid=15955783 |doi=10.1093/bioinformatics/bti537 |url=http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=15955783}}

*{{cite journal |author=Schlessinger A, Punta M, Yachdav G, Kajan L, Rost B |title=Improved disorder prediction by combination of orthogonal approaches |journal=PLoS ONE |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=e4433 |year=2009 |pmid=19209228 |pmc=2635965 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0004433 |url=http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004433}}
* Iakoucheva LM, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Obradovic Z & Dunker AK. Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins. ''J. Mol. Biol''. 323, 573–584, 2002.
*{{cite journal |author=Mizianty MJ, Stach W, Chen K, Kedarisetti KD, Disfani FM, Kurgan L |title=Improved sequence-based prediction of disordered regions with multilayer fusion of multiple information sources |journal=Bioinformatics |volume=26 |issue=18 |pages=i489–96 |year=2010 |month=September |pmid=20823312 |pmc=2935446 |doi=10.1093/bioinformatics/btq373 |url=http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=20823312}}

* Ferron F, Longhi S, Canard B, Karlin B. A practical overview of protein disorder prediction methods. ''PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics'', 65:1-14, 2006.

* Uversky VN, Gillespie JR, Fink, AL. Why are "natively unfolded proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? ''PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics'', 41:415-427, 2000.

* Gunasekaran K, Tsai CJ, Kumar S, Zanuy D & Nussinov R. Extended disordered proteins: targeting function with less scaffold. ''Trends Biochem''. Sci. 28, 81–85, 2003.

* Collins MO, Yu L, Campuzano I, Grant SG, Choudhary JS. Phosphoproteomic analysis of the mouse brain cytosol reveals a predominance of protein phosphorylation in regions of intrinsic sequence disorder. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008 Apr 3

* J. Prilusky, C.E. Felder, T. Zeev-Ben-Mordehai, E. Rydberg, O. Man, J.S. Beckmann, I. Silman, J.L. Sussman, FoldIndex©: a simple tool to predict whether a given protein sequence is intrinsically unfolded. ''Bioinformatics'' 21:3435-3438, 2005. {{Entrez Pubmed|15955783 }}

* Schlessinger A, Punta M, Yachdav G, Kajan L, Rost B. Improved disorder prediction by combination of orthogonal approaches. PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4433. {{Entrez Pubmed|19209228}}

* Sandhu KS, Dash D. Dynamic alpha-helices: conformations that do not conform. Proteins. 2007 Jul 1;68(1):109-22. PubMed PMID: 17407165.

* Sandhu KS. Intrinsic disorder explains diverse nuclear roles of chromatin remodeling proteins. J Mol Recognit. 2009 Jan-Feb;22(1):1-8. PubMed PMID:
18802931.

* Mizianty MJ, Stach W, Chen K, Kedarisetti KD, Disfani FM, Kurgan L.Improved sequence-based prediction of disordered regions with multilayer fusion of multiple information sources. Bioinformatics. 2010 Sep 15;26(18):i489-96. {{Entrez Pubmed|20823312}}




==External links==
==External links==

Version vom 20. Februar 2011, 00:20 Uhr

Vorlage:No footnotes Vorlage:Cleanup Intrinsically unstructured proteins, often referred to as naturally unfolded proteins or disordered proteins, are proteins characterized by lack of stable tertiary structure when the protein exists as an isolated polypeptide chain (a subunit) under physiological conditions in vitro. The discovery of intrinsically unfolded proteins challenged the traditional protein structure paradigm, which states that a specific well-defined structure was required for the correct function of a protein and that the structure defines the function of the protein. This is clearly not the case for intrinsically unfolded proteins that remain functional despite the lack of a well-defined structure. Such proteins, in some cases, can adopt a fixed three dimensional structure after binding to other macromolecules.

Biological role of intrinsic disorder

Many disordered proteins have the binding affinity with their receptors regulated by post-translational modification, thus it has been proposed that the flexibility of disordered proteins facilitates the different conformational requirements for binding the modifying enzymes as well as their receptors. Intrinsic disorder is particularly enriched in proteins implicated in cell signaling, transcription and chromatin remodeling functions.[1]

Flexible linkers

Disordered regions are often found as flexible linkers connecting two globular domains. Linker sequences vary greatly in length and amino acid sequence, but are similar in amino acid composition (rich in polar uncharged amino acids). Flexible linkers allow the connecting domains to freely twist and rotate through space to recruit their binding partners.

Coupled folding and binding

Many unstructured proteins undergo transitions to more ordered states upon binding to their targets. The coupled folding and binding may be local, involving only a few interacting residues, or it might involve an entire protein domain. It was recently shown that the coupled folding and binding allows the burial of a large surface area that would only be possible for fully structured proteins if they were much larger.[2] Moreover, certain disordered regions might serve as "molecular switches" in regulating certain biological function by switching to ordered conformation upon molecular recognition like small molecule-binding, DNA/RNA binding, ion interactions etc.[3]

The ability of disordered proteins to bind, and thus to exert a function, shows that stability is not a required condition.

Sequence signatures of disorder

Intrinsically unstructured proteins are characterized by a low content of bulky hydrophobic amino acids and a high proportion of polar and charged amino acids. Thus disordered sequences cannot bury sufficient hydrophobic core to fold like stable globular proteins. In some cases, hydrophobic clusters in disordered sequences provide the clues for identifying the regions that undergo coupled folding and binding.

Many disordered proteins also reveal low complexity sequences, i.e. sequences with overrepresentation of a few residues. While low complexity sequences are a strong indication of disorder, the reverse is not necessarily true, that is, not all disordered proteins have low complexity sequences.

Disordered proteins have a low content of predicted secondary structure.

Identification of intrinsically unstructured proteins

Intrinsically unfolded proteins, once purified, can be identified by various experimental methods. Folded proteins have a high density (partial specific volume of 0.72-0.74 mL/g) and commensurately small radius of gyration. Hence, unfolded proteins can be detected by methods that are sensitive to molecular size, density or hydrodynamic drag, such as size exclusion chromatography, analytical ultracentrifugation, Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and measurements of the diffusion constant. Unfolded proteins are also characterized by their lack of secondary structure, as assessed by far-UV (170-250 nm) circular dichroism (esp. a pronounced minimum at ~200 nm) or infrared spectroscopy.

Unfolded proteins have exposed backbone peptide groups exposed to solvent, so that they are readily cleaved by proteases, undergo rapid hydrogen-deuterium exchange and exhibit a small dispersion (<1 ppm) in their 1H amide chemical shifts as measured by NMR. (Folded proteins typically show dispersions as large as 5 ppm for the amide protons.)

The primary method to obtain information on disordered regions of a protein is NMR spectroscopy. The lack of electron density in X-ray crystallographic studies may also be a sign of disorder.

De novo prediction of intrinsically unstructured proteins

Computational methods exploit the sequence signatures of disorder to predict whether a protein is disordered given its amino acid sequence. The table below, which was originally adapted from[4] and has been recently updated, shows the main features of software for disorder prediction. Note that different software use different definitions of disorder.

Predictor What is predicted Based on Generates and uses multiple sequence alignment?
PONDR All regions that are not rigid including random coils, partially unstructured regions, and molten globules Local aa composition, flexibility, hydropathy, etc No
SEG Low-complexity segments that is, “simple sequences” or “compositionally biased regions”. Locally optimized low-complexity segments are produced at defined levels of stringency and then refined according to the equations of Wootton and Federhen No
Disopred2 Regions devoid of ordered regular secondary structure Cascaded support vector machine classifiers trained on PSI-BLAST profiles Yes
Globplot Regions with high propensity for globularity on the Russell/Linding scale (propensities for secondary structures and random coils) Russell/Linding scale of disorder No
Disembl LOOPS (regions devoid of regular secondary structure); HOT LOOPS (highly mobile loops); REMARK465 (regions lacking electron density in crystal structure) Neural networks trained on X-ray structure data No
NORSp Regions with No Ordered Regular Secondary Structure (NORS). Most, but not all, are highly flexible. Secondary structure and solvent accessibility Yes
FoldIndex Regions that have a low hydrophobicity and high net charge (either loops or unstructured regions) Charge/hydrophaty analyzed locally using a sliding window No
Charge/hydropathy method.[5] Fully unstructured domains (random coils) Global sequence composition No
HCA (Hydrophobic Cluster Analysis) Hydrophobic clusters, which tend to form secondary structure elements Helical visualization of amino acid sequence No
PreLink Regions that are expected to be unstructured in all conditions, regardless of the presence of a binding partner Compositional bias and low hydrophobic cluster content. No
IUPred Regions that lack a well-defined 3D-structure under native conditions Energy resulting from inter-residue interactions, estimated from local amino acid composition No
RONN Regions that lack a well-defined 3D structure under native conditions Bio-basis function neural network trained on disordered proteins No
MD (Meta-Disorder predictor) Regions of different "types"; for example, unstructured loops and regions containing few stable intra-chain contacts A neural-network based meta-predictor that uses different sources of information predominantly obtained from orthogonal approaches Yes
GeneSilico Metadisorder Regions that lack a well-defined 3D structure under native conditions (REMARK-465) Meta method which uses other disorder predictors (like RONN, IUPred, POODLE and many more). Based on them the consensus is calculated according method accuracy (optimized using ANN, filtering and other techniques). Currently the best available method (first 2 places in last CASP experiment (blind test)) Yes
IUPforest-L Long disordered regions in a set of proteins Moreau-Broto auto-correlation function of amino acid indices (AAIs) No
MFDp Different types of disorder including random coils, unstructured regions, molten globules, and REMARK-465-based regions. An ensemble of 3 SVMs specialized for the prediction of short, long and generic disordered regions, which combines three complementary disorder predictors, sequence, sequence profiles, predicted secondary structure, solvent accessibility, backbone dihedral torsion angles, residue flexibility and B-factors. MFDp (unofficially) secured 3rd place in last CASP experiment) Yes

Since the methods above use different definitions of disorder and they were trained on different datasets, it is difficult to estimate their relative accuracy, but disorder prediction category is a part of biannual CASP experiment which is designed to test methods according accuracy in finding regions with missing 3D structure.

References

Vorlage:Reflist

  • Dyson HJ, Wright PE: Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. In: Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6. Jahrgang, Nr. 3, März 2005, S. 197–208, doi:10.1038/nrm1589, PMID 15738986.
  • Dunker AK, Silman I, Uversky VN, Sussman JL: Function and structure of inherently disordered proteins. In: Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18. Jahrgang, Nr. 6, Dezember 2008, S. 756–64, doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2008.10.002, PMID 18952168 (elsevier.com).
  • Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF, Jones DT: Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. In: J. Mol. Biol. 337. Jahrgang, Nr. 3, März 2004, S. 635–45, doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.002, PMID 15019783 (elsevier.com).
  • Iakoucheva LM, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Obradović Z, Dunker AK: Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins. In: J. Mol. Biol. 323. Jahrgang, Nr. 3, Oktober 2002, S. 573–84, PMID 12381310 (elsevier.com).
  • Collins MO, Yu L, Campuzano I, Grant SG, Choudhary JS: Phosphoproteomic analysis of the mouse brain cytosol reveals a predominance of protein phosphorylation in regions of intrinsic sequence disorder. In: Mol. Cell Proteomics. 7. Jahrgang, Nr. 7, Juli 2008, S. 1331–48, doi:10.1074/mcp.M700564-MCP200, PMID 18388127 (mcponline.org).
  • Prilusky J, Felder CE, Zeev-Ben-Mordehai T, et al.: FoldIndex: a simple tool to predict whether a given protein sequence is intrinsically unfolded. In: Bioinformatics. 21. Jahrgang, Nr. 16, August 2005, S. 3435–8, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti537, PMID 15955783 (oxfordjournals.org).
  • Schlessinger A, Punta M, Yachdav G, Kajan L, Rost B: Improved disorder prediction by combination of orthogonal approaches. In: PLoS ONE. 4. Jahrgang, Nr. 2, 2009, S. e4433, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004433, PMID 19209228, PMC 2635965 (freier Volltext) – (plos.org).
  • Mizianty MJ, Stach W, Chen K, Kedarisetti KD, Disfani FM, Kurgan L: Improved sequence-based prediction of disordered regions with multilayer fusion of multiple information sources. In: Bioinformatics. 26. Jahrgang, Nr. 18, September 2010, S. i489–96, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq373, PMID 20823312, PMC 2935446 (freier Volltext) – (oxfordjournals.org).

External links

Database of Protein Disorder

Disorder prediction methods

  1. Sandhu KS: Intrinsic disorder explains diverse nuclear roles of chromatin remodeling proteins. In: J. Mol. Recognit. 22. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, 2009, S. 1–8, doi:10.1002/jmr.915, PMID 18802931.
  2. Gunasekaran K, Tsai CJ, Kumar S, Zanuy D, Nussinov R: Extended disordered proteins: targeting function with less scaffold. In: Trends Biochem. Sci. 28. Jahrgang, Nr. 2, Februar 2003, S. 81–5, PMID 12575995 (elsevier.com).
  3. Sandhu KS, Dash D: Dynamic alpha-helices: conformations that do not conform. In: Proteins. 68. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, Juli 2007, S. 109–22, doi:10.1002/prot.21328, PMID 17407165.
  4. Ferron F, Longhi S, Canard B, Karlin D: A practical overview of protein disorder prediction methods. In: Proteins. 65. Jahrgang, Nr. 1, Oktober 2006, S. 1–14, doi:10.1002/prot.21075, PMID 16856179.
  5. Uversky VN, Gillespie JR, Fink AL: Why are "natively unfolded" proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? In: Proteins. 41. Jahrgang, Nr. 3, November 2000, S. 415–27, doi:10.1002/1097-0134(20001115)41:3<415::AID-PROT130>3.0.CO;2-7, PMID 11025552.