„Justin Kruger“ – Versionsunterschied

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
[ungesichtete Version][ungesichtete Version]
Inhalt gelöscht Inhalt hinzugefügt
Ethanbas (Diskussion | Beiträge)
new page, research section copied from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Dunning
 
Ethanbas (Diskussion | Beiträge)
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Zeile 5: Zeile 5:


== Research ==
== Research ==
Kruger is well known for co-authoring a 1999 study with Justin Kruger, now of the [[Stern School of Business]]. This study showed that people who performed in the lowest at certain tasks, such as judging humor, grammar, and logic, significantly overestimated how good they were at these tasks. This study has since given rise to what is known as the [[Dunning-Kruger effect]], in which people who are bad at certain tasks mistakenly think they are in fact good at them. The study also found that people who performed slightly above average at identifying how funny a given joke was tended to be the most accurate at assessing how good they were at the assigned tasks, and that those who performed the best tended to think they performed only slightly above average.
Kruger is well known for co-authoring a 1999 study<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Kruger|first1=J|last2=Dunning|first2=D|title=Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.|journal=Journal of personality and social psychology|date=December 1999|volume=77|issue=6|pages=1121–34|pmid=10626367|doi=10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121}}</ref> with David Dunning.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://hbr.org/2005/12/those-who-cant-dont-know-it | title=Those Who Can’t, Don’t Know It | work=Harvard Business Review | date=December 2005 | accessdate=25 May 2016 | author=Abrahams, Marc}}</ref> This study showed that people who performed in the lowest at certain tasks, such as judging humor, grammar, and logic, significantly overestimated how good they were at these tasks. This study has since given rise to what is known as the [[Dunning-Kruger effect]], in which people who are bad at certain tasks mistakenly think they are in fact good at them.<ref name=at>{{cite web | url=http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/05/revisiting-why-incompetents-think-theyre-awesome/ | title=Revisiting why incompetents think they’re awesome | work=Ars Technica | date=25 May 2012 | accessdate=25 May 2016 | author=Lee, Chris}}</ref> The study also found that people who performed slightly above average at identifying how funny a given joke was tended to be the most accurate at assessing how good they were at the assigned tasks, and that those who performed the best tended to think they performed only slightly above average.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20131125-why-the-stupid-say-theyre-smart | title=The more inept you are the smarter you think you are | work=BBC Future | date=25 November 2013 | accessdate=25 May 2016 | author=Stafford, Tom}}</ref> In 2012, Dunning told ''[[Ars Technica]]'' that he "thought the paper would never be published" and that he was "struck just with how long and how much this idea has gone viral in so many areas."<ref name=at/>


== References ==
== References ==

Version vom 3. Mai 2017, 21:13 Uhr

Justin Kruger is an American social psychologist and professor at New York University Stern School of Business.[1][2]

Education

Kruger received his B.Sc in Psychology from Santa Clara University in 1993 (spending his junior year at Durham University, UK), and received his Ph.D. in Social Psychology from Cornell University in 1999.[1][2]

Research

Kruger is well known for co-authoring a 1999 study[3] with David Dunning.[4] This study showed that people who performed in the lowest at certain tasks, such as judging humor, grammar, and logic, significantly overestimated how good they were at these tasks. This study has since given rise to what is known as the Dunning-Kruger effect, in which people who are bad at certain tasks mistakenly think they are in fact good at them.[5] The study also found that people who performed slightly above average at identifying how funny a given joke was tended to be the most accurate at assessing how good they were at the assigned tasks, and that those who performed the best tended to think they performed only slightly above average.[6] In 2012, Dunning told Ars Technica that he "thought the paper would never be published" and that he was "struck just with how long and how much this idea has gone viral in so many areas."[5]

References

Vorlage:Reflist

  1. a b Justin Kruger: JUSTIN KRUGER Curriculum Vitae. Abgerufen am 3. Mai 2017.
  2. a b Nadia N. Cureton: Justin Kruger: Associate Professor of Marketing. In: pages.stern.nyu.edu. Abgerufen am 3. Mai 2017.
  3. J Kruger, D Dunning: Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. In: Journal of personality and social psychology. 77. Jahrgang, Nr. 6, Dezember 1999, S. 1121–34, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121, PMID 10626367.
  4. Abrahams, Marc: Those Who Can’t, Don’t Know It. In: Harvard Business Review. Dezember 2005, abgerufen am 25. Mai 2016.
  5. a b Lee, Chris: Revisiting why incompetents think they’re awesome. In: Ars Technica. 25. Mai 2012, abgerufen am 25. Mai 2016.
  6. Stafford, Tom: The more inept you are the smarter you think you are. In: BBC Future. 25. November 2013, abgerufen am 25. Mai 2016.