Benutzer Diskussion:ThePhotografer
Letzter Kommentar: vor 1 Jahr von Sänger in Abschnitt Du wurdest auf der Seite Vandalismusmeldung gemeldet (2022-05-29T09:23:51+00:00)
Du wurdest auf der Seite Vandalismusmeldung gemeldet (2022-05-29T09:23:51+00:00)[Quelltext bearbeiten]
Hallo ThePhotografer, Du wurdest auf der o. g. Seite gemeldet. Weitere Details kannst du dem dortigen Abschnitt entnehmen. Wenn die Meldung erledigt ist, wird sie voraussichtlich hier archiviert werden.
Wenn du zukünftig nicht mehr von diesem Bot informiert werden möchtest, trage dich hier ein. – Xqbot (Diskussion) 11:23, 29. Mai 2022 (CEST)
- Auch wenn Du jetzt versuchts hier nützliche Idioten zu finden, Dein Fotospam ist aufgeflogen, lass es einfach sein und fang an Dich kooperativ und nicht egomanisch zu verhalten. --Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (Reden) 12:25, 7. Jun. 2022 (CEST)
- I don't know what the problem is but it's probably serious. Greetings--ThePhotografer (Diskussion) 13:04, 7. Jun. 2022 (CEST)
- You know perfectly well what the problem is: It's your urge to get your pictures as prominent as possible in as much as possible articles in as much as possible WPs, regardless of the usefulness of those pictures. --Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (Reden) 13:23, 7. Jun. 2022 (CEST)
- I put up photos that I think are better,you want to take them down? I didn't insist but I don't understand why you have to insult. Take them down, warn the user and friends as before. Greetings.--ThePhotografer (Diskussion) 13:31, 7. Jun. 2022 (CEST)
- Take the Ark of Titus: Your pic shows just a part of it, not the whole ark, so it's definitely worse then others. It may be useful for some special concerns, but not as a representation of the whole ark. It's plain and pure vanity, nothing else, you don't care about the content at all, just about showing off. --Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (Reden) 13:51, 7. Jun. 2022 (CEST)
- the arch is clearly visible, however can you manage not to insult? just take it off. however I think it is a lost cause. I close it here.--ThePhotografer (Diskussion) 14:00, 7. Jun. 2022 (CEST)
- Where, exactly, are the bases of the ark on that picture? --Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (Reden) 14:04, 7. Jun. 2022 (CEST)
- the arch is clearly visible, however can you manage not to insult? just take it off. however I think it is a lost cause. I close it here.--ThePhotografer (Diskussion) 14:00, 7. Jun. 2022 (CEST)
- Take the Ark of Titus: Your pic shows just a part of it, not the whole ark, so it's definitely worse then others. It may be useful for some special concerns, but not as a representation of the whole ark. It's plain and pure vanity, nothing else, you don't care about the content at all, just about showing off. --Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (Reden) 13:51, 7. Jun. 2022 (CEST)
- I put up photos that I think are better,you want to take them down? I didn't insist but I don't understand why you have to insult. Take them down, warn the user and friends as before. Greetings.--ThePhotografer (Diskussion) 13:31, 7. Jun. 2022 (CEST)
- You know perfectly well what the problem is: It's your urge to get your pictures as prominent as possible in as much as possible articles in as much as possible WPs, regardless of the usefulness of those pictures. --Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (Reden) 13:23, 7. Jun. 2022 (CEST)
- I don't know what the problem is but it's probably serious. Greetings--ThePhotografer (Diskussion) 13:04, 7. Jun. 2022 (CEST)