Benutzer:ElKurashi/Liste der Kriterien der Important Plant Areas
Quelle zu Kriterien [1]
| Kriterium | Beschreibung | Schwellwert | Quellen und Leitlininen zum Bewerten der Kriterien |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ai | Am Standort befindet sich eine oder mehr global bedrohte Arten | Standort, von dem bekannt ist, angenommen wird oder auf den geschlossen wird, dass er
mindestens1% der globalen Population beinhaltet |
(1) Qualifying species must be listed as threatened [vulnerable (VU), endangered (EN) or critically endangered (CR); IUCN 2012] on the IUCN global Red List (www.iucnredlist.org) or, if relevant or appropriate, the 1997 IUCN Red List of Threatened Plants (Walter and Gillett 1997).
(2) It is acceptable to include those species assessed as threatened and accepted by the IUCN review process but awaiting upload onto the IUCN Red List. (3) Wherever possible, both the global and national importance of the site should be documented by applying the % population thresholds for each threatened species; the selection of ‘‘best sites’’ should only be applied where population data are not available and cannot be inferred. (4) If the IPA contains a single-site, threatened (CR or EN) endemic species, i.e., the site effectively holds the entire global population of that species, this should be recorded in the site documentation. (5) A(i) species of high socio-economic importance (nationally, regionally or globally) can be tagged as such to facilitate subsequent analysis focused on useful species. |
| UND/ODER mindestens5% der nationale Population | |||
| ODER national unter den 5 "besten Standorten" für diese Art, je nachdem was am besten geeignet ist | |||
| Aii | Am Standort befindet sich eine oder mehr regional bedrohte Arten | Standort, von dem bekannt ist, angenommen wird oder auf den geschlossen wird, dass er mindestens5% der nationalen Population beinhaltet | (1) Qualifying species must be listed as threatened on an IUCN Regional Red List OR another regionally approved, peer-reviewed threat list, for example the threatened medicinal plants of the Himalaya (Hamilton and Radford 2007).
(2) Note (5) for sub-criterion A(i) is equally applicable here. |
| UND/ODER mindestens5% der nationalen Population beinhaltet | |||
| ODER national unter den 5 "besten Standorten" für diese Art, je nachdem was am besten geeignet ist | |||
| Aiii | Das Gebiet enthält eine oder mehrere stark eingeschränkte endemische Arten, die potenziell bedroht sind. | Standort, von dem bekannt ist, angenommen wird oder auf den geschlossen wird, dass er mindestens1% der globalen Population beinhaltet | (1) A ‘‘Highly Restricted Endemic’’ (HRE) is defined as a species with a total range of 100 km2. These definitions of ‘‘highly restricted’’ and ‘‘range restricted’’ are aligned respectively to the CR and EN range (EOO) thresholds for IUCN threat assessments under criterion B (2012). Endemism is defined by ecological range size rather than by political borders, and thus A(iii) and A(iv) species can have trans-border ranges. A(iii) and A(iv) are recorded separately to allow for more detailed analysis of sites and species; they share the same thresholds.
(2) Species should be listed as HREs or RREs on a recognised national or regional list that can be developed, peer-reviewed and published as part of the IPA identification process. (3) HREs and RREs that have already been assessed on the IUCN Red List are excluded from these sub-criteria except where listed as Data Deficient. If they have been assessed as threatened (VU, EN or CR), they should be considered under subcriterion A(i); if assessed as least concern or near threatened, they should be included in the species list for sub-criterion B(ii). (4) Notes (3)–(5) for sub-criterion A(i) are equally applicable to sub-criteria A(iii) and A(iv). In addition, where a site is known or inferred to contain mindestens10% of a HRE or RRE, this should be recorded in the site documentation. |
| UND/ODER mindestens5% der nationalen Population beinhaltet | |||
| ODER national unter den 5 "besten Standorten" für diese Art, je nachdem was am besten geeignet ist | |||
| Aiv | Das Gebiet enthält eine oder mehrere endemische Arten, deren Verbreitungsgebiet eingeschränkt ist und die potenziell bedroht sind. | Standort, von dem bekannt ist, angenommen wird oder auf den geschlossen wird, dass er mindestens1% der globalen Population beinhaltet | |
| UND/ODER mindestens5% der nationalen Population beinhaltet | |||
| ODER national unter den 5 "besten Standorten" für diese Art, je nachdem was am besten geeignet ist |
| Kriterium | Beschreibung | Schwellwert | Quellen und Leitlininen zum Bewerten der Kriterien |
|---|---|---|---|
| B(i) | Das Gebiet enthält eine große Anzahl von Arten innerhalb bestimmter Lebensraum- oder Vegetationstypen | For jedes Habitat oder Vegetationstyp: bis zu 10% der nationalen Ressourcen des gesamten nationalen IPA-Netzes können ausgewählt werden | (1) The development and use of national indicator species for each habitat/vegetation type is encouraged, given sufficient data. Indicator species chosen for B(i) should be characteristic species that indicate good quality habitat: axiophytes (see Lockton 2005; Botanical Society of Britain and Ireland 2016).
(2) Botanical richness is linked to habitats in this sub-criterion to give an indication of habitat quality-the best peat bogs, the best chalk grasslands, etc., since it is important to compare like with like. Sites that have exceptional richness because they hold a mosaic of habitats within a small area should be identified using B(ii) below. (3) This sub-criterion should only be applied for defined habitats where there is a sufficient level of information on species composition in order to determine habitat quality. It is likely to be difficult to apply systematically in many tropical countries, where habitat classifications at an appropriately fine scale and lists of indicator species for habitat quality often do not currently exist. In these cases, sub-criterion B(ii) is likely to be more appropriate-assessors should apply either B(i) or B(ii), not both. |
| ODER national unter den 5 "besten Standorten" für diese Art, je nachdem was am besten geeignet ist | |||
| B(ii) | Das Gebiet enthält eine außergewöhnliche Anzahl von Arten mit hoher Schutzbedeutung | Standort ist bekannt, mindestens3% der zur Erhaltung wichtigen Arten der ausgewählten nationalen Liste zu beinhalten. | (1) B(ii) species can be selected from the following categories: (a) restricted range species, defined as those with a total range of \10,000 km2 (note: species also qualifying under IPA criterion A are NOT excluded), (b) national endemic species, (c) national Red List species not covered by criterion A. It is not obligatory to include all of the categories (a–c). The possible inclusion here of national endemics—defined by political borders—is not without controversy, but we acknowledge that national endemic species can be of importance in conservation planning and so should be recognised as species of high conservation importance. The decision as to which species groups from (a) to (c) are chosen for applying this sub-criterion should be made by the national IPA constituency.
(2) Lists of species used should be published and justified as part of the IPA identification process. (3)The species list can comprise qualifying species from the total flora or mycota of the country, or the qualifying species from one or more taxonomic groups (for example, a plant family) that is/are representative of the wider flora or mycota and so can be used as proxy group(s) for measuring exceptional richness. (4) There is no prescriptive minimum number of species for a site to qualify as this will depend in part on the richness of the national flora or mycota and of its species of high conservation importance, but the site should be exceptional at a national scale; this judgement can be made by the national IPA constituency. (5) Sites selected should have reasonable ecological and geographical integrity, whether a habitat mosaic or otherwise, and should not be greater than 1% of the area of the country or 50,000 km2, whichever is the smaller. |
| ODER Standort is unter den 15 artenreichsten nationalen Standortn, je nachdem was am besten geeignet ist | |||
| B(iii) | Das Gebiet enthält eine außergewöhnliche Anzahl von gesellschaftlich, wirtschaftlich oder kulturell wertvollen Arten | Standort ist bekannt, mindestens3% der gesellschaftlich, wirtschaftlich oder kulturell wertvollen Arten zu beinhalten. | (1) B(iii) species can be selected from the following categories and should focus on those species that would benefit from site-based conservation measures: (a) socio- economically important wild-harvested species, including medicinal plants, foodplants, resin/dye plants, timber species, etc., (b) CWRs, (c) other culturally and spiritually important plants; (d) CITES species listed on Appendix 1 or Appendix 2 (excluding plant groups where whole families/genera are listed on Appendix 2 such as orchids, Aloe spp., succulent Euphorbia spp.).
(2) A list of B(iii) species should be published and justified as part of the IPA identification process. Naturalised alien species should not be included on this list except where a strong case can be made for their inclusion (e.g., thoroughly naturalised archaeophytes); this is a decision for the national IPA constituency. (3) Notes (4) and (5) for sub-criterion B(ii) equally apply here. |
| ODER Standort is unter den 15 artenreichsten nationalen Standortn, je nachdem was am besten geeignet ist |
| Kriterium | Beschreibung | Threshold | Quellen und Leitlininen zum Bewerten der Kriterien |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ci | Standort enthält weltweit bedrohten oder eingeschränkten Lebensraum/Vegetationstyp | Standort, von dem bekannt ist, angenommen wird oder auf den geschlossen wird das er mindestens 5% der nationalen Ressourcen (Fläche) des gefährdeten Habitats beinhaltet. | (1) C(i) threatened or restricted habitat/vegetation types are taken from a globally recognised list, potentially following the categories and criteria of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Ecosystems (Bland et al. 2015). This list does not exist at present but may do in future so is included to ‘future-proof’ the criteria.
(2) The 20–60% threshold is derived from the EU Habitats Directive for priority threatened habitats and so may not be appropriate for use outside Europe, where the C5% threshold may be more appropriate. (3) Wherever possible, the national importance of the site should be documented by applying the threshold for the % of the national resource; the selection of ‘‘best sites’’ should only be applied where quantitative data are not available and cannot be inferred. (4) In addition to meeting the national thresholds, if the site is known or inferred to contain C5% of the global extent of a globally Endangered or Critically Endangered habitat/vegetation type, C10% of the global extent of a globally Vulnerable habitat/ vegetation type, or C20% of the global extent of a geographically-restricted habitat/vegetation type regardless of threat status, then this should be recorded in the site documentation to assist with alignment to KBA criteria. |
| ODER der Standort gehört zu den besten Beispielen, die erforderlich sind, um 20-60 % der nationalen Ressourcen kollektiv zu priorisieren | |||
| ODER der Standort zählt zu den 5 “besten Standorten” für diese Habitat, je nachdem was am besten geeignet ist | |||
| Cii | Standort enthält regional bedrohten oder eingeschränkten Lebensraum/Vegetationstyp | Standort, von dem bekannt ist, angenommen wird oder auf den geschlossen wird das er mindestens 5% der nationalen Ressourcen (Fläche) von bedrohtem Habitattyp beinhaltet | (1) C(ii) restricted or threatened habitats or vegetation types are taken from a regionally recognised list. This list can be developed, peer-reviewed and published as part of the IPA identification process if neighbouring countries are involved.
(2) Notes (2) and (3) for sub-criterion C(i) equally apply here. |
| OR site is among the best quality examples required to collectively prioritise 20-60% of the national resource | |||
| oder national unter den 5 "besten Standorten" für diese Art, je nachdem was am besten geeignet ist | |||
| Ciii | Standort enthält national bedrohten oder eingeschränkten Lebensraum/Vegetationstyp UND/ODER Lebensräume, deren Ausdehnung auf nationaler Ebene stark zurückgegangen ist | Standort, von dem bekannt ist, angenommen wird oder auf den geschlossen wird das er mindestens 10% der nationalen Ressourcen (Fläche) von bedrohtem Habitattyp beinhaltet | (1) C(iii) restricted or threatened habitats or vegetation types are taken from a nationally recognised list. This list can be developed, published and peer reviewed as part of the IPA identification process. A good example of this is the nationally threatened habitat list of Armenia (Asatryan and Fayvush 2013).
(2) Habitats that have ‘‘severely declined in extent’’ are defined as those that have declined in extent by 50% or more nationally since 1900. (3) This sub-criterion will capture the most intact examples of those habitats that are threatened or highly restricted or severely declining within the country (and potentially more widely). It can also capture those habitats that have a nationally restricted range, even though they are more common elsewhere, if they are an important national resource and/or they are important as ‘edge of range’ examples. (4) This sub-criterion is more appropriate to use in larger and/or data poor countries where data are held at a national level—in time it will help countries obtain a greater understanding of threatened/restricted habitats in their countries and how they relate to the wider regional and/or global picture. (5) Note (3) of sub-criterion C(i) equally applies here. |
| OR site is among the best quality examples required to collectively prioritise up to 20% of the national resource | |||
| OR the 5 ‘‘best sites’’ for that habitat nationally, whichever is most appropriate |
- ↑ PlantLife Important Plant Areas. Abgerufen am 26. September 2023.