„Zerlegung in flächengleiche Dreiecke“ – Versionsunterschied

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
[ungesichtete Version][ungesichtete Version]
Inhalt gelöscht Inhalt hinzugefügt
Melchoir (Diskussion | Beiträge)
Melchoir (Diskussion | Beiträge)
+Sakai et al
Zeile 59: Zeile 59:


The topic of equidissections has recently been popularized by treatments in ''[[The Mathematical Intelligencer]]'' {{harv|Stein|2004}}, a volume of the [[Carus Mathematical Monographs]] {{harv|Stein|Szabó|2008}}, and the fourth edition of ''[[Proofs from THE BOOK]]'' {{harv|Aigner|Ziegler|2010}}.
The topic of equidissections has recently been popularized by treatments in ''[[The Mathematical Intelligencer]]'' {{harv|Stein|2004}}, a volume of the [[Carus Mathematical Monographs]] {{harv|Stein|Szabó|2008}}, and the fourth edition of ''[[Proofs from THE BOOK]]'' {{harv|Aigner|Ziegler|2010}}.

==Related problems==
{{harvtxt|Sakai|Nara|Urrutia|2005}} consider a variation of the problem: Given a convex polygon ''K'', how much of its area can be covered by ''n'' non-overlapping triangles of equal area? The ratio of the area of the best possible coverage to the area of ''K'' is denoted ''t''<sub>''n''</sub>(''K''). If ''K'' has an ''n''-equidissection, then ''t''<sub>''n''</sub>(''K'') = 1; otherwise it is less than 1. The authors show that for a quadrilateral ''K'', ''t''<sub>''n''</sub>(''K'') ≥ 4''n''/(4''n'' + 1), with ''t''<sub>2</sub>(''K'') = 8/9 if and only if ''K'' is affinely congruent to the trapezoid ''T''(2/3). For a pentagon, ''t''<sub>2</sub>(''K'') ≥ 2/3, ''t''<sub>3</sub>(''K'') ≥ 3/4, and ''t''<sub>''n''</sub>(''K'') ≥ 2''n''/(2''n'' + 1) for ''n'' ≥ 5.


==References==
==References==
Zeile 93: Zeile 96:
*{{Citation |last=Richman |first=Fred |last2=Thomas |first2=John |date=March 1967 |title=Problem 5471 |journal=American Mathematical Monthly |volume=74 |issue=3 |page=329 |doi=10.2307/2316055}}
*{{Citation |last=Richman |first=Fred |last2=Thomas |first2=John |date=March 1967 |title=Problem 5471 |journal=American Mathematical Monthly |volume=74 |issue=3 |page=329 |doi=10.2307/2316055}}
*{{Citation |last=Rudenko |first=Daniil |title=On equidissection of balanced polygons |arxiv=1206.4591}}
*{{Citation |last=Rudenko |first=Daniil |title=On equidissection of balanced polygons |arxiv=1206.4591}}
*{{Citation |last=Sakai |first=T. |last2=Nara |first2=C. |last3=Urrutia |first3=J. |year=2005 |chapter=Equal Area Polygons in Convex Bodies |pages=146–158 |editors=Jin Akiyama, Edy Tri Baskoro, Mikio Kano |title=Combinatorial Geometry and Graph Theory: Indonesia-Japan Joint Conference, IJCCGGT 2003, Bandung, Indonesia, September 13-16, 2003, Revised Selected Papers |series=Lecture Notes in Computer Science |volume=3330 |publisher=Springer |isbn=3-540-24401-8 |doi=10.1007/978-3-540-30540-8_17 |zbl=1117.52010 |url=http://www.math.unam.mx/~urrutia/online_papers/IJCCGGT(Sakai)f.pdf}}
*{{Citation |last=Schulze |first=Bernd |date=1 July 2011 |title=On the area discrepancy of triangulations of squares and trapezoids |journal=[[Electronic Journal of Combinatorics]] |volume=18 |issue=1 |page=#P137 |zbl=1222.52017 |url=http://www.combinatorics.org/ojs/index.php/eljc/article/view/v18i1p137}}
*{{Citation |last=Schulze |first=Bernd |date=1 July 2011 |title=On the area discrepancy of triangulations of squares and trapezoids |journal=[[Electronic Journal of Combinatorics]] |volume=18 |issue=1 |page=#P137 |zbl=1222.52017 |url=http://www.combinatorics.org/ojs/index.php/eljc/article/view/v18i1p137}}
*{{Citation |last=Stein |first=Sherman K. |date=June 1989 |title=Equidissections of centrally symmetric octagons |journal=Aequationes Mathematicae |volume=37 |issue=2–3 |pages=313–318 |doi=10.1007/BF01836454 |zbl=0681.52008}}
*{{Citation |last=Stein |first=Sherman K. |date=June 1989 |title=Equidissections of centrally symmetric octagons |journal=Aequationes Mathematicae |volume=37 |issue=2–3 |pages=313–318 |doi=10.1007/BF01836454 |zbl=0681.52008}}

Version vom 6. August 2012, 06:43 Uhr

A 6-equidissection of a square

In geometry, an equidissection is a polygon that has been cut up into triangles of equal area. Although the topic sounds like something the ancient Greeks might have studied, equidissections were not considered until 1965. The results were surprising. Monsky's theorem states that a square cannot be equidissected into an odd number of triangles. In fact, most polygons cannot be equidissected at all.

Much of the literature is aimed at generalizing Monsky's theorem to broader classes of polygons. The general question is: Which polygons can be equidissected into how many pieces? Particular attention has been given to trapezoids, kites, regular polygons, centrally symmetric polygons, polyominos, and hypercubes.

Equidissections do not have many direct applications. They are considered interesting because the results are counterintuitive at first, and for a geometry problem with such a simple definition, the theory requires some surprisingly sophisticated algebraic tools.

Overview

Definitions

A dissection of a polygon P is a finite set of triangles that do not overlap and whose union is all of P. A dissection into n triangles is called an n-dissection, and it is classified as an even dissection or an odd dissection according to whether n is even or odd.Vorlage:Sfn

An equidissection is a dissection in which every triangle has the same area. For a polygon P, the set of all n for which an n-equidissection of P exists is called the spectrum of P and denoted S(P). A general theoretical goal is to compute the spectrum of a given polygon.Vorlage:Sfn

A dissection is called simplicial if the triangles meet only along common edges. Some authors restrict their attention to simplicial dissections, especially in the secondary literature, since they are easier to work with. For example, the usual statement of Sperner's lemma applies only to simplicial dissections. Often simplicial dissections are called triangulations, although the vertices of the triangles are not restricted to the vertices or edges of the polygon. Simplicial equidissections are therefore also called equal-area triangulations.Vorlage:Sfn

The terms can be extended to higher-dimensional polytopes: an equidissection is set of simplexes having the same n-volume.Vorlage:Sfn

Preliminaries

It is easy to find an n-equidissection of a triangle for all n. As a result, if a polygon has an m-equidissection, then it also has an mn-equidissection for all n. In fact, often a polygon's spectrum consists precisely of the multiples of some number m; in this case, both the spectrum and the polygon are called principal and the spectrum is denoted .Vorlage:Sfn For example, the spectrum of a triangle is . A simple example of a non-principal polygon is the quadrilateral with vertices (0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 1), (3/2, 3/2); its spectrum includes 2 and 3 but not 1.Vorlage:Sfn

Affine transformations of the plane are useful for studying equidissections, including translations, uniform and non-uniform scaling, reflections, rotations, shears, and other similarities and linear maps. Since an affine transformation preserves straight lines and ratios of areas, it sends equidissections to equidissections. This means that one is free to apply any affinity to a polygon that might give it a more manageable form. For example, it is common to choose coordinates such that three of the vertices of a polygon are (0, 1), (0, 0), and (1, 0).

The affine invariance of equidissections also means that certain results can be easily generalized. Any result stated for a regular polygon also holds for an affine-regular polygon; in particular, results concerning the unit square also apply to other parallelograms, including rectangles and rhombuses. Any result stated for polygons with integer coordinates also applies to polygons with rational coordinates, or polygons whose vertices fall on any other lattice.

Best results

Monsky's theorem states that a square has no odd equidissections, so its spectrum is .Vorlage:Sfn More generally, it is known that centrally symmetric polygons and polyominos have no odd equidissections.[1] A conjecture by Vorlage:Harvtxt proposes that any special polygon has no odd equidissections, where a special polygon is one whose equivalence classes of parallel edges each sum to the zero vector. Squares, centrally symmetric polygons, and polyominos are all special polygons.

For n > 4, the spectrum of a regular n-gon is .Vorlage:Sfn For n > 1, the spectrum of an n-dimensional cube is .Vorlage:Sfn

Let T(a) be a trapezoid where a is the ratio of parallel side lengths. If a is a rational number, then T(a) is principal. In fact, if r/s is a fraction in lowest terms, then .Vorlage:Sfn More generally, any convex polygon with rational coordinates can be equidissected,Vorlage:Sfn although not all rational polygons are principal; see the above example of a kite with a vertex at (3/2, 3/2).

At the other extreme, if a is a transcendental number, then T(a) has no equidissection. More generally, any polygon whose vertex coordinates are algebraically independent has no equidissection.[2] This means that almost all polygons with more than three sides cannot be equidissected. Although most polygons can't be cut into equal-area triangles, any polygon can be cut into equal-area quadrilaterals.Vorlage:Sfn

If a is an algebraic irrational number, then T(a) is a trickier case. If a is algebraic of degree 2 or 3 (quadratic or cubic), and its conjugates all have positive real parts, then S(T(a)) contains all sufficiently large n such that n/(1 + a) is an algebraic integer.Vorlage:Sfn It is conjectured that a similar condition involving stable polynomials may determine whether or not the spectrum is empty for algebraic numbers a of all degrees.[3]

History

Monsky's theorem

The study of equidissections began in 1965, when Fred Richman was preparing a master's degree exam at New Mexico State University. He wanted to include a question on geometry, and he noticed that it was difficult to find (what is now called) an odd equidissection of a square. Richman proved to himself that it was impossible for 3 or 5, that the existence of an n-equidissection implies the existence of an (n + 2)-dissection, and that certain quadrilaterals arbitrarily close to being squares have odd equidissections.Vorlage:Sfn However, he didn't solve the general problem of odd equidissections of squares, and he left it off the exam. Richman's friend John Thomas became interested in the problem; in his recollection,

"Everyone to whom the problem was put (myself included) said something like 'that is not my area but the question surely must have been considered and the answer is probably well known." Some thought they has seen it, but could not remember where. I was interested because it reminded me of Sperner's Lemma in topology, which has a clever odd-even proof."Vorlage:Sfn

Thomas proved that an odd equidissection was impossible if the coordinates of the vertices are rational numbers with odd denominators. He submitted this proof to Mathematics Magazine, but it was put on hold:

"The referee's reaction was predictable. He thought the problem might be fairly easy (although he could not solve it) and was possibly well-known (although he could find no reference to it)."Vorlage:Sfn

The question was instead given as an Advanced Problem in the American Mathematical Monthly Vorlage:Harv. When nobody else submitted a solution, the proof was published in Mathematics Magazine Vorlage:Harv, three years after it was written. Vorlage:Harvtxt then built on Thomas' argument to prove that there are no odd equidissections of a square, without any rationality assumptions.Vorlage:Sfn

Monsky's proof relies on two pillars: a combinatorial result that generalizes Sperner's lemma and an algebraic result, the existence of a 2-adic valuation on the real numbers. A clever coloring of the plane then implies that in any dissection of the square, at least one triangle has an area with what amounts to an even denominator, and therefore any equidissection must be even. The essence of the argument is found already in Vorlage:Harvtxt, but Vorlage:Harvtxt was the first to use a 2-adic valuation to cover dissections with arbitrary coordinates.[4]

Generalizations

The first generalization of Monsky's theorem was Vorlage:Harvtxt, who proved that the spectrum of an n-dimensional cube is . The proof is revisited by Vorlage:Harvtxt.

Generalization to regular polygons arrived in 1985, during a geometry seminar run by G. D. Chakerian at UC Davis. Elaine Kasimatis, a graduate student, "was looking for some algebraic topic she could slip into" the seminar.Vorlage:Sfn Sherman Stein suggested dissections of the square and the cube: "a topic that Chakerian grudgingly admitted was geometric."Vorlage:Sfn After her talk, Stein asked about regular pentagons. Kasimatis answered with Vorlage:Harvtxt, proving that for n > 5, the spectrum of a regular n-gon is . Her proof builds on Monsky's proof, extending the p-adic valuation to the complex numbers for each prime divisor of n and applying some elementary results from the theory of cyclotomic fields. It is also the first proof to explicitly use an affine transformation to set up a convenient coordinate system.Vorlage:Sfn Vorlage:Harvtxt then framed the problem of finding the spectrum of a general polygon, introducing the terms spectrum and principal.Vorlage:Sfn They proved that almost all polygons lack equidissections, and that not all polygons are principal.Vorlage:Sfn

Vorlage:Harvtxt began the study of the spectra of two particular generalizations of squares: trapezoids and kites. Trapezoids have been further studied by Vorlage:Harvtxt, Vorlage:Harvtxt, and Vorlage:Harvtxt. Kites have been further studied by Vorlage:Harvtxt. General quadrilaterals have been studied in Vorlage:Harvtxt. Several papers have been authored at Hebei Normal University, chiefly by Professor Ding Ren and his students Du Yatao and Su Zhanjun.[5]

Attempting to generalize the results for regular n-gons for even n, Vorlage:Harvtxt conjectured that no centrally symmetric polygon has an odd equidissection, and he proved the n = 6 and n = 8 cases. The full conjecture was proved by Vorlage:Harvtxt. A decade later, Stein made what he describes as "a surprising breakthrough", conjecturing that no polyomino has an odd equidissection. He proved the result of a polyomino with an odd number of squares in Vorlage:Harvtxt. The full conjecture was proved when Vorlage:Harvtxt treated the even case.

The topic of equidissections has recently been popularized by treatments in The Mathematical Intelligencer Vorlage:Harv, a volume of the Carus Mathematical Monographs Vorlage:Harv, and the fourth edition of Proofs from THE BOOK Vorlage:Harv.

Vorlage:Harvtxt consider a variation of the problem: Given a convex polygon K, how much of its area can be covered by n non-overlapping triangles of equal area? The ratio of the area of the best possible coverage to the area of K is denoted tn(K). If K has an n-equidissection, then tn(K) = 1; otherwise it is less than 1. The authors show that for a quadrilateral K, tn(K) ≥ 4n/(4n + 1), with t2(K) = 8/9 if and only if K is affinely congruent to the trapezoid T(2/3). For a pentagon, t2(K) ≥ 2/3, t3(K) ≥ 3/4, and tn(K) ≥ 2n/(2n + 1) for n ≥ 5.

References

Vorlage:Reflist

Bibliography

Secondary sources

Vorlage:Refbegin

Vorlage:Refend

Primary sources

Vorlage:Refbegin

Vorlage:Refend

  1. Vorlage:Harvnb; Vorlage:Harvnb
  2. See Vorlage:Harvtxt for more precise statements of this principle.
  3. Vorlage:Harvnb; Vorlage:Harvnb
  4. Vorlage:Harvnb; Vorlage:Harvnb
  5. Vorlage:Harvnb; Vorlage:Harvnb