Diskussion:Koenraad Elst

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
Letzter Kommentar: vor 8 Jahren von Nuuk in Abschnitt Islamkritiker?
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen

Discussion on K. Elst[Quelltext bearbeiten]

LvR For a discussion on all the controversies about K. Elst, see the english version of Wikipedia.

Ist das unser User Koenraad?[Quelltext bearbeiten]

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Koenraad --217.82.184.198 14:41, 26. Jun. 2011 (CEST)Beantworten

Verleumdungen[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Elst über Hindutva:

  • This is in line with my oft-stated criticism of Hindu nationalism or “Hindutva”. I have consistently argued that nationalism was understandable in the context of the anticolonial struggle, but had now become counterproductive and leads to a misstatement of legitimate Hindu concerns. In fact, this is one of the points that define the specificity of my analysis of the Hindutva movement and should certainly figure in a lemma on me.
  • It would be more appropriate to say that I am the only Westerner who criticized the Hindutva movement all while knowing the subject. I criticized it thoroughly in my book BJP vs. Hindu Resurgence and passim in Decolonizing the Hindu Mind and some other books. But the approved Western “experts” are just parrots of the Indian establishment, which in turn has historically been formed by an ideological interiorization of Western prejudices about Indian religions and society. Their position is that everything that conflicts with the conventional view must be “Hindutva”. I have explicitly analyzed and refuted that assumption at length, and if your contributor had actually read me, he would have known that and mentioned it.
  • Hindutva is a fairly crude ideology, borrowing heavily from European nationalisms with their emphasis on homogeneity. Under the conditions of British colonialism, it was inevitable that some such form of Hindu nationalism would arise, but I believe better alternatives have seen the light, more attuned to the genius of Hindu civilization.


Elst über Neue Rechte und Vlaams Belang:

Actually, even when I occasionally published in a Nouvelle Droite paper (TeKoS), I never endorsed Nouvelle Droite viewpoints, such as their anti-Liberalism, their anti-Americanism, or their championing “identity”, or the “Traditionalism” which some of its leading lights espouse. The only time I wrote in a real Nouvelle Droite publication (Nouvelle Ecole 2000), it was to defend the Out-of-India Theory against the Aryan Invasion Theory, central to the Nouvelle Droite worldview and defended in that same issue by both Prof. Jean Haudry and Alain de Benoist. Recently I have written some skeptical comments on the Nouvelle Droite, but throughout, I have absolutely never expressed any kind of agreement with it or, when it still mattered, even just an opinion on it. You or your sources are simply inventing this. If not, show me. And I don’t mean the gossip by my enemies, quoted on your talk page as authoritative, but an actual text by me. As the writer of thousands of pages of well-considered findings, I have a right to be evaluated on what I have actually written rather than on some vague rumours propagated by my self-declared enemies.
Apart from TeKoS, I only contributed a single article to any Nouvelle Droite publication, viz. to their flagship publication Nouvelle Ecole, where in 2001 I contributed a defence of the Out-of-IndiaTheory, directly flying in the face of the Nouvelle Droite position (which is very pro-AIT) and answered on the spot by both Alain de Benoist, their mastermind, and Jean Haudry, their specialist on Indo-European matters. It is a good thing that they are more open-minded than the Indian secularists, but that shouldn’t obscure our differences.
That can be generalized: though I published in the Nouvelle Droite publication TeKoS, Meera Nanda and her friends will have a hard time finding articles of mine where I develop the typical Nouvelle Droite themes, such as identity. There are even articles where I lambast the Nouvelle Droite (or the Vlaams Belang, for that matter), but they are in Dutch, which I surmise Meera Nanda does not read. Note however that it is her own unsolicited conceit that she is a specialist on the thoughts of Koenraad Elst.

Damit sollte geklärt sein, dass dieser Edit https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Koenraad_Elst&diff=next&oldid=84098143 rückgängig gemacht werden sollte. (nicht signierter Beitrag von Calypsomusic (Diskussion | Beiträge) 19:29, 12. Jun. 2014 (CEST))Beantworten

Islamkritiker?[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Ist Elst als Islamkritiker bekannt? Im Artikel Anders Behring Breivik wird er so bezeichnet. --Nuuk 10:14, 6. Dez. 2015 (CET)Beantworten