Wikipedia Diskussion:WikiProjekt Vorlagenauswertung/en

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen

Ich hoffe es findet sich erneut ein Übersetzer für die Änderungen der deutschen Seite. Auch wären jetzt englische Beispiele sinnvoll, diese sollte jedoch recht klein sein um die Datenbank am Leben zu lassen. Danke. Kolossos 10:34, 21. Apr. 2007 (CEST)Beantworten

Hi, (sorry, I can't speak german too much) could you update this version of your very useful tool, so I could continue updating pictures in finnish wikipedia? Thanks, kallerna 15:52, 20. Okt. 2007 (CEST)

English is no problem. We will update the datas in two weeks. Earlier isn't possible because Stefan Kühn working on his dissertation. --Kolossos 18:21, 20. Okt. 2007 (CEST)Beantworten
Ok, thanks a lot. kallerna 10:58, 21. Okt. 2007 (CEST)
Hmm. Has it been already updated, 'cause I won't find any new data, or am I just doing something wrong? kallerna 17:13, 11. Nov. 2007 (CET)
Sorry, we need a little bit longer. Perhaps next week. --Kolossos 22:51, 11. Nov. 2007 (CET)Beantworten
Now I can say that you are bit slow :).. But could you have it done before christmas? kallerna 18:38, 3. Dez. 2007 (CET)
Unfurtunally, I believe we need a little bit longer than christmas, Stafan is working hard on his dissertation and also because we have some trouble on the toolserver. --Kolossos 21:56, 3. Dez. 2007 (CET)Beantworten
Have you forgotten me, or why haven't you updated the tool? kallerna 15:05, 26. Mär. 2008 (CET)

Query[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Hi. I don't fully understand the current status of the project. Is it live and fully working? If there is some data that I would like to get hold of, do I just issue a query to the server such as this and copy/paste the result into an excel file to analyse? Sorry if I'm a bit dim. Thks Fmph 23:57, 15. Feb. 2009 (CET)Beantworten

The project should work if the database on the toolserver is running but in the moment I get also no result. The last update from english wikipedia was done on 2008-10-08. We hope the next update is coming this week. Which tool you use for analyses is equal you can also using only your eyes. It should be much faster for you with our tool to extract the datas for one template than by using the dump with actual 7.8 GB. --Kolossos 08:19, 16. Feb. 2009 (CET)Beantworten

Obsolete template[Quelltext bearbeiten]

I don't know if this can help you but some templates are now unused on french wikipedia. I give you a list here

  1. Chimiebox général
  2. Chimiebox physique température fusion
  3. chimiebox physique densité
  4. chimiebox physique solubilité
  5. Chimiebox physique masse moléculaire
  6. chimiebox précautions
  7. Chimiebox physique température vaporisation
  8. chimiebox physique propriété spéciale
  9. Chimiebox SMILES
  10. Chimiebox PubChem
  11. Chimiebox InChI

All these templates are included now in one unique template fr:modèle:Chimiebox which is already present in your template list. Snipre 05:17, 23. Mär. 2009 (CET)Beantworten

I hope we make an update next time. That solves the problem. --Kolossos 09:12, 23. Mär. 2009 (CET)Beantworten

New kind of template on french WP[Quelltext bearbeiten]

In order to have a common template for personalities, a french project developed a new type of template called "modbox". That's a modular template which splits the different characteristics of a person in groups. That allows the use of common fields for all templates but let the possibility of adaptation. Example for Arnold Schwarzenegger who is an actor and a politician. Now we have to choose the template (politician or actor) for that person:

{{Infobox Cinéma (personnalité)
| nom                 = <!-- titre de l’infobox -->
| image               = 
| taille image        = 
| légende             = <!-- légende de l’image -->
| nom de naissance    = 
| surnom              = <!-- pseudo, autre nom, nom de scène -->
| date de naissance   = 
| lieu de naissance   = 
| nationalité         = <!-- pays d’origine -->
| date de mort        = 
| lieu de mort        = 
| profession(s)       = <!-- principaux : réalisateur, scénariste, … -->
| films notables      = <!-- seulement trois ou quatre -->
| conjoint            = <!-- seulement si célèbre -->
| enfant              = <!-- seulement si célèbre -->
| site web            = 
| imdb                = <!-- seulement l’identifiant : par ex 0033567 -->
| récompense          = <!-- principales ou lien vers section -->
}}

or

{{Boite Homme Politique
| nom            =
| prénom         =
| drapeau        =
| pays           =
| image          =
| position       =
| date           =
| prédécesseur   =
| successeur     =
| annéenaissance =?
| datenaissance  =
| lieunaissance  =
| annéedécès     =?
| datedécès      =
| lieudécès      =
| profession     =
| parti          =
| dernierparti   =
| carrière       =
}}

With the new template we can put all these elements in one template. This template is focused on the person and not on his position. In order to keep a link with the project Persondata we split the activities and the person data. So now with the new template we have something like that:

{{Modbox XXX}}
{{Modbox biography
 name =
 first name =
 birth date =
...
}}
{{Modbox Actor
 Oscar =
 most important films =
...
}}
{{Modbox Politician
 political party =
 predecessor =
 successor =
...
}}
{{Modbox end}}

An example here or a list of propositions here

My question: is it still possible to extract the information using the tool developed in this project for that template? Thank you. Snipre 11:48, 3. Apr. 2009 (CEST)Beantworten

We will not change our script for Arnold! ;-) But we work in the moment on the script to support better sub-templates, so we wil see if it's work. --Kolossos 23:18, 3. Apr. 2009 (CEST)Beantworten
Thank you for considering the request. As there is some resistance against the change of the present infoboxes we expect that with the possibility to perform global search about personalities it will be easier to make the infoboxes uniform. If you have a solution please just let a message here in order to give us the possibility of launching consultations. Snipre 02:50, 23. Apr. 2009 (CEST)Beantworten

Just an idea[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Sorry to disturb you again but I have a proposition for a further development of your database: creation of dynamic list. As you improve your extraction system in order to renew the database after each dump, it can be interesting to use your database to create list of articles sharing common features to WP. I don't know if it is possible to create one template which get directly the data from your database like {{ImportDataToolserver|"Infobox name"|"Parameter1"|"Parameter2"| ... }}.
An exemple could be that: {{ImportDataToolserver|Chimiebox|Nom|Formule|masseMol}} to obtain this page.
That would be a big improvement to have updated lists without using categories system. Just an idea. Snipre 10:56, 14. Mai 2009 (CEST)Beantworten

It is not possible to get access with mediawiki-template to external datas. Thats a security question and not solveable with external solutions like templatetiger. A solution would be only possible with mediawiki-extensions like fr:Semantic MediaWiki.
But it would be very easy to generate automatic lists like Modèle:Chimiebox/Extraction/Formules brutes in Wiki-syntax with the help of the datas. Everybody with toolserver-account have directly access to the datas and can write a script to do this. An example sql-commando can you found here. One way would be to copy the result in the wiki, the other way would be to link only from the wiki to the script with the dynamic list. I hope this answer your question. --Kolossos 16:44, 14. Mai 2009 (CEST)Beantworten

Irgendwas stimmt nicht: EN[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Irgendwas ist schlecht am letzten Datenbunkump mit der EN:WP, wie ein Vergleich der aktuellen Daten mit den alten Daten zeigt. Viele Vorlagen werden gar nicht oder zu niedrig angegeben. --Matthiasb 14:18, 23. Jun. 2009 (CEST)Beantworten

Ich tippe mal darauf, dass das Skript abgestürtzt ist oder der Toolserver runtergefahren wurde. Das ist die einzigste Erklärung, da es ja bei allen anderen Sprachen funktioniert. -- sk 14:26, 23. Jun. 2009 (CEST)Beantworten
Ursache war, dass ich mein Einleseprozeß gestartet hatte obwohl Stefans Skript noch lief. Stafan, du wolltest doch mal schauen, wann bei dir im Skript das Datum gesetzt wird nach dem ich mich richte. Momentan sind aber auch die Server in der Umstellung sodaß ich erstmal nachfragen muß, wann und wohin ich die Daten am besten einspiele. --Kolossos 16:35, 23. Jun. 2009 (CEST)Beantworten

Proposal on http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Erzbischof/data.wikimedia.org[Quelltext bearbeiten]

I consider to make a proposal on strategy.wikimedia, maybe you are interested to participate:

This is an long term proposal: We collect immense amounts of data without doing much effort do make it processurable. A natural extension of what we do is a project data.wikimedia.com, providing a host for data with an orientation on processurability by (computer-)programs. This would work hand in hand with wikipedia-Projects as de:Wikipedia:WikiProjekt_Vorlagenauswertung/en The steering by wikimedia is needed because we have an hypertext environment which is adapted to put any amout of human readable text into context, but not to host data.

This is the first and sole paragraph of http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Erzbischof/data.wikimedia.org . Maybe someone connected with this project would like to bring his on ideas into. My still vague goal is a service orientated at historical time series and series of general interest generated by Wikipedia-articels, etc. Greetings, --Erzbischof 21:06, 13. Aug. 2009 (CEST)Beantworten

Update commonswiki[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Hi, according to this table it's been over a year since it was updated. Could you run another update for it ? Also I'm curious if you know why this doesn't return any results (Template:Wikbreak usage@commonswiki). Thank you, --Krinkle 13:27, 7. Jul. 2010 (CEST)Beantworten

We only extract article namespace so user pages are not part of the project. --Kolossos 19:05, 25. Aug. 2010 (CEST)Beantworten
I read your message and see it's been updated now in January 2011. Thanks a lot! Krinkle 04:18, 7. Feb. 2011 (CET)Beantworten

fr dump[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Is there something wrong with the french dump?

For example tt says Infobox Gare usage is 60 whereas it should be more than 4000...

Gonioul 10:19, 8. Apr. 2011 (CEST)Beantworten

The same big delay is for ru-wiki :( Infovarius 04:23, 30. Nov. 2011 (CET)Beantworten
Hmm, normaly it should work. At the moment I run a new session of dumpscans. In the next days we will see results. -- sk 18:07, 1. Dez. 2011 (CET)Beantworten

Dump update scheduling[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Hi. On itwiki we are applying some changes on synoptic templates: I found this tools and this is exactly what I'm looking for! I've noted that database dump was updated 3 months ago for itwiki. Are there updated on a regular basis or on request? Could the update time lag be lowered (eg. one time on 7-15 days)? Thanks. --Dzag 23:12, 12. Jun. 2011 (CEST)Beantworten

Hello Dzag, I start normaly every 2 or 3 months a new session where I scan all dumps new. At the moment it run parallel 3 dumpscans. I think in the next 2 or 3 days also itwiki will be done. At the moment I think the change of a dump is not so big, if you see how big the XML-File is. Maybee in the future I will implement a script where you can start a new scan as user. At the moment you see only the status of the dumps at this page. --sk 21:59, 30. Nov. 2011 (CET)Beantworten
Hello, is the actual date of updating of template data available somewhere? If not, how about showing it? --151.96.3.242 10:56, 16. Feb. 2012 (CET)Beantworten

Is the update date ... updated? Here pt.wiki had a dump at 2012-06-07, but in here its still 2011-11-12. Is the dump used 20 days old, or 8 months old? Rjclaudio msg 20:25, 17. Jul. 2012 (CEST)Beantworten

First the checkwiki-script scan the dump and generate the template-tiger-file. So when the last checkwiki-scan of ptwiki is 8 months old, then also the data in templatetiger is 8 months old. In the next days I will scan also ptwiki new. -- sk (Diskussion) 14:28, 2. Aug. 2012 (CEST)Beantworten

updating dumps[Quelltext bearbeiten]

I needed to use this tool on itwiki and i found out template-tiger hasnt been updated since 2011. Is it possibile to update itwiki database? (I think also enwiki might be useful)--Nickanc (Diskussion) 23:27, 23. Jul. 2012 (CEST)Beantworten

itwiki is now updated (Dump from May 2012). I hope this help. --Kolossos (Diskussion) 18:15, 27. Jul. 2012 (CEST)Beantworten
There is something wrong: template-tiger calls the database it.wiki but infact it contains templates from... dewikip. Could you fix it?--Nickanc (Diskussion) 20:35, 27. Jul. 2012 (CEST)Beantworten
I work on it. The problem was the last change at the toolserver. They restructure the dump directory. In the next day I will scan all dumps new. -- sk (Diskussion) 14:25, 2. Aug. 2012 (CEST)Beantworten
Any news?--Nickanc (Diskussion) 23:31, 8. Aug. 2012 (CEST)Beantworten
I'd also appreciate if you'd update svwiktionary. :-) Skalman (Diskussion) 10:18, 10. Aug. 2013 (CEST)Beantworten
Is it possible to update once again it.wiki? We worked alot on template errors and now it would be useful to verify the residual ones. Many thanks. --EH101 (Diskussion) 17:34, 18. Okt. 2013 (CEST)Beantworten

Probleme mit Vorlagenauswertung[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Erstmal danke für die Tools, einige wie das hier brauche ich zwar nur sporadisch aber ich finde sie grossartig. Nun zu meinem Problem:

http://tools.wmflabs.org/templatetiger/template-noparameter.php?template=Infobox%20Ort%20in%20der%20Schweiz&lang=dewiki&parameter=L%C3%84NGENGRAD

http://tools.wmflabs.org/templatetiger/template-noparameter.php?template=HLS&lang=dewiki&parameter=Autor

obige beiden Abfragen scheitern aus dem selben Grund, scheinbar die Tabellengrösse. Da es sich aber nicht um die meistverwendeten Vorlagen handelt, kann ich aber nicht ganz nachvollziehen, dass es da Probleme geben sollte. Gibt es eine Lösung oder "work around" ? Gruss --Horgner (Diskussion) 09:42, 26. Nov. 2013 (CET)Beantworten

Problems with search[Quelltext bearbeiten]

I think underscores in parameter name causes troubles in search. Look here:

--XXN (Diskussion) 01:25, 8. Mär. 2014 (CET)Beantworten

Latvian Wikipedia[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Hi all! Would it be possible to include also Latvian Wikipedia to list? See big potential for Wikidata import :) @Stefan Kühn, Kolossos:. --Edgars2007 (Diskussion) 14:05, 17. Okt. 2015 (CEST)Beantworten

I forwarded this request to User:Bgwhite. He pre-pairs all extracts for templatiger. We will see. --Kolossos 21:31, 19. Okt. 2015 (CEST)Beantworten
The problem seems that Bgwhite get no dumps on labs for lv.wp. --Kolossos 19:41, 20. Okt. 2015 (CEST)Beantworten

Commons[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Any plans for supporting Commons? Danmichaelo (Diskussion) 22:32, 26. Dez. 2015 (CET)Beantworten

Tool funktioniert nicht[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Tool funktioniert seit Tagen nicht mehr. --RusslandRussland Dostojewskij (Diskussion) 23:45, 24. Aug. 2016 (CEST)Beantworten

Dumps update[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Hi @Kolossos:

I see that the dumps for frwiki are quite old (2014/2015) could they be updated ? (I could use them to check consistency with Wikidata data).

Cdlt VIGNERON * discut. 15:38, 3. Mär. 2017 (CET)Beantworten

@VIGNERON: Done. --Kolossos 19:38, 4. Mär. 2017 (CET)Beantworten

Adding Commons[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Hi @Kolossos:

Would it be possible to add Wikimedia Commons ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 21:20, 4. Aug. 2017 (CEST)Beantworten

No, not in the moment. I believe it's heavy in size and I have to fight in the moment generally with this bug. --Kolossos 21:46, 28. Feb. 2018 (CET)Beantworten