Diskussion:Silvestrol
Please correct the data on this page[Quelltext bearbeiten]
@Ghilt, Leyo: There is a problem with the recent creation of the Wikidata item linked with this article: Wikidata has already one item for silvertol, see Q27135085 linked to the PubChem CID 11787114.
When comparing the different PubChem CIDs, we can see that 11787114 provides a complete defined stereoisomer and not 66575060 where one stereoisomer center is not defined.
So looking at the picture provided in the article, we can see that all 9 stereoisomer centers are defined so then the PubChem CID in the article is not correct according to the picture. Please clarify the structure which is described in this article, then correct the data or the picture and finally linked the article to the correct WD item. By the way it would be good is someone can provide a source for the CAS number because now this CAS number is used for two different structures: this is not impossible but this should be sourced in order to avoid any confusion. Danke. Snipre (Diskussion) 23:24, 23. Apr. 2017 (CEST)
- Ok, will do, cheers, --Ghilt (Diskussion) 23:50, 23. Apr. 2017 (CEST)
- @Snipre: According to TSOL, the structure shown in the article corresponds to the compound's entry in SciFinder. --Leyo 16:57, 15. Sep. 2017 (CEST)
Estrogen?[Quelltext bearbeiten]
Das Molekül sieht wie ein geeigneter Ligand für Estrogenrezeptoren aus. wie der Name auch schon anzudeuten scheint. --FK1954 (Diskussion) 15:00, 21. Jan. 2019 (CET)