Wikipedia:GLAM/dt.Projekte

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen

Commons Batch Uploading is a project to centralize the uploading of a collection of files, that have released their work as PD or any Commons compatible license. The files would be assigned to a bot operator who would see how the request would be fulfilled. (To upload batches from Flickr, please make requests on Commons:Flickr batch uploading)

See w:Wikipedia:Public domain image resources for potential future batch uploads. {{Commons:Batch uploading/Button}}

11k of Areal Photos[Quelltext bearbeiten]

In the course of the arial photo project of the German Wikimedia de:Wikipedia:Projekt Fotoflüge I wrote an article for a pilots magazine. After that I got in contact with a Pilot who wants to share his own created areal photo collection which he created over the past 24 years. It seams that all photos are already geo-referenced and classified (by type like solar power plant, church as well as by region like Europe, Andalucia, Sanlucar). The classification as well as the geo-reference is within the exif data of the images. During a manual upload the geo-reference was recognized correct by commons. Because of the big amount of pictures it would be fine if there is some way to may automize the upload and if possible somehow to match the classification of the pictures to the commons categories. I have no idea if or how this is possible and it would be great to get some information if this is possible or to get some help for this request. The Classification is sometimes in German and not matching the Commons categories. The Pilot has already created a Wikipedia / Commons User and uploaded one example file where you could see how the data is sored within the exif Data.

  • Source to upload from:

The files are on a computer of the pilot / photographer.

    • Did you observe an URL pattern
    • Do you know whether the site as an API
    • What else can ease uploading (is the site valid XHTML, WCM they use…)?
    • Did you contact the site owner?

Not the site owner but the photographer User:Graf-flugplatz

  • Describe the works to be uploaded in detail (audio files, images by …):

About 11.000 of digital arial photos should be uploaded.

  • Which license tag(s) should be applied?

Has to be clarified with Author, but expect "CC BY-SA 3.0" like the example.

Update 18.12.2012: License "CC BY-SA 3.0" is approved by Author User:Graf-flugplatz.

  • Is there a template that could be used on the file description pages? Do you think a special template should be created?


Opinions[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Nice sample images. I'm from Germany too and I like to help. But not before end of april 2013 because I am away and busy. If this will be ok, just waiting ... --Slick (talk) 17:26, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Ok, how can I get the images to upload? I like to have them here, so I can check the tags they have and can try to find best categories for. Possible solutions are I download them all from a source or you can send it to me on by CD/DVD (I am from germany too). You can contact me (in german please) here about this. Additional I suggest the pilot (or you) fill in a minimal content on his userpage for other they are interesting in the source/creator. (i.E. the same information as in this request) --Slick (talk) 08:51, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Assigned to Progress Bot name Category
Slick Waiting for user response...


Rudolf Steiner Gesamtausgabe[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Die folgende Seite bietet alle Werke der Gesamtausgabe Rudolf Steiners (gemeinfrei) als Scan in zitierfähigen Ausgaben. Eine Übernahme zu Wikimedia Commons wurde hier besprochen und gewünscht.

http://bdn-steiner.ru/modules.php?name=Ga

  • I downloading the files und prepare for upload. Which one is the correct licence template in this case? I guess PD-old. Only this or need a second one? --Slick (talk) 21:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Downloads finish. --Slick (talk) 08:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

A discussion in german about the licence can found here. Looks like there is a problem with scans from sources newer than 1923. --Slick (talk) 13:35, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

I cancel to support this batch job, remove all local work already done, because missing help/support although requested more than one time. Revert job to Request-List. --Slick (talk) 20:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Opinions[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Assigned to Progress Bot name Category



de.wikipedia.org[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Everything in wikipedia:de:Kategorie:Datei:Commonsfähig that does not have wikipedia:de:Vorlage:NoCommons attached. Matt (talk) 12:06, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Opinions[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Some guys including myself at wikipedia:de:Wikipedia:WikiProjekt Commons-Transfer are currently doing this half-manually using Commons:Tools#Commons Helper which is a quite old and umaintained script. As there are >100.000 images ready for transfer this is going to take too long. It is also a very repetitive task as CommonsHelper does the same conversion-errors over and over again and it's successor is also not working / developed actively. There is User:Boteas, but it needs an extra template to start working which complicates everything even more. A more automatised solution would be great. Matt (talk) 12:06, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Vorlage:Oppose I am astonished... why have we de:WP:NCF? Keep in mind that not all pictures which should have have the NoCommons template attached. E.g. Photographs of protected buildings in France. → automated transferring is not possible. At some step the licensing needs to be checked. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 16:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
    • Vorlage:Oppose It should be clear, that the category Datei:Commonsfähig isn't set manually per review, but only by license-templates. Actually, we have some pictures of Paul Klee, that are tagged with PD-old at de.wp, but aren't free in US and so not commons-compatible. This couldn't be sorted by a bot. At this time, there are some projects locally for transferring to Commons, so the files on de.wp decreases about 100 per day. So for every not manually checked pictures that isn't ready for commons it have to be undeleted on de.wp and deleted here. There are 459 Files transferred to commons, that aren't checked - why work on this first? Additionally, all Files at the sub-categories of de:Wikipedia:Dateiüberprüfung have to be excluded. --Quedel (talk) 23:42, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Further templates that need a manually review: Templates: Panoramafreiheit. (not completed list yet) --Quedel (talk) 23:49, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Perhaps It should be possible to find some categories to work on. For example PD old, NASA images etc. If the license is wrong then file should be deleted on de-wiki anyway. Admins could do the check when they delete the file on de-wiki. If the file is ok they delete the local file. If not they nominate local + Commons file for deletion. Files could also be tagged with a special template on Commons to show this file is removed without a review. It the template has two links "OK" and Not OK" users can click on it only takes a moment to review. If ok template is removed and if not ok file is nominated for deletion. --MGA73 (talk) 16:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
    • Agree >95% is just the usual GFDL and/or CC-BY-SA licensing, mostly photos. This can be moved automatically and then afterwards checked and not transferred half-manually and then "bot move checked". Matt (talk) 13:30, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Then we need to disable revobot to not have all the images in their "raw state" (unchecked) directly in nowCommons category at dewp. There needs to be a detailed plan when which actions need to be done and who does it and how long it will approximately take. And of course a calculation where the savings (if there are at all) are. Your first request here was a bit rushed, Matt. And: to be honest, I would prefer to discuss this in German. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:48, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
To MGA73's ongoing: There is a well system for files with lacking informations, that will result in fine licensed-files for about half the files. With this new way, this files will be lost, because no automatically asking the uploader will be possible. Another problem is: who will do the work? The list of "NowCommons"-Files not deleted on de.wikipedia increases, there aren't enoug admins to check they. And there are are more than 500 files transferred to commons and not checked. Additionally, there are an amount of file, not tagged with FoP or similiar, or files that are PD-old in Germany, but not on Commons (for example: pictures from Mr. Klee). So this file would be transferred get the "NowCommons-Template" locally, then had to be deleted on Commons and untagged locally. How many files are in Kategorie:Commonsfähig? Approximate 80.000 files (only half of all files). Testing the category GFDL-Bild shows, that only 55% are commons-ready as they are tagged actually (for CC-by-sa, the most chosen license i cannot check it, CatScan doesnt handel so much files). To Saibo: Disucssing in German would nice. --Quedel (talk) 23:11, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
The plan could be like this. We choose a category where we expect that perhaps > 95 % of the files to be good. Then some users scan the category for junk and possible copyvios and tag those few files for deletion or a "don't move". Then a bot moves the rest of the files - perhaps except those without a description. Then admins on de-wiki deletes the local file if transfer is ok. If not they change the "NowCommons" to a "NoCommons" (or whatever template is used on de-wiki) and mark file for deletion on Commons. That way we only have to check files once.
If the bot works correct there is no need to check that information is transfered correctly. Then we "just" need to check if the license is valid and the categories. If license is ok and the only outstanding issue then we could still delete the file on Commons.
Big categories is not a problem. We just do the queries we need on toolserver to find the files to work on. So just bring up all ideas and things we should know, do or not do. --MGA73 (talk) 18:14, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Ich mach mal 'ne Liste (die kann sicherlich effizienter noch zusammengefasst werden)

include
exclude
Zu bedenken und einzusortieren in die obigen Kategorien

--Quedel (talk) 23:56, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

needs manual tweaking or intelligent bot

 Info: Announcement of a new bot: COM:VP#Easy bulk transfer from English Wikipedia to Commons. --Leyo 16:51, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Assigned to Progress Bot name Category



Virtual Manuscript Library of Switzerland[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Scans of manuscripts from the Virtual Manuscript Library of Switzerland. At this date, there are 482 manuscripts from 20 different libraries: http://www.e-codices.unifr.ch/en

Usual copyfraud restrictions included... :(

Opinions[Quelltext bearbeiten]

http://www.e-codices.unifr.ch/en/list/all/ is a nice list. If they have some logic on their website, automatic scraping of their site will be noticed. So don't go too fast ;-) Multichill (talk) 21:10, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Assigned to Progress Bot name Category


Virtual Manuscript Library of Switzerland[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Scans of manuscripts from the Virtual Manuscript Library of Switzerland. At this date, there are 482 manuscripts from 20 different libraries: http://www.e-codices.unifr.ch/en

Usual copyfraud restrictions included... :(

Opinions[Quelltext bearbeiten]

http://www.e-codices.unifr.ch/en/list/all/ is a nice list. If they have some logic on their website, automatic scraping of their site will be noticed. So don't go too fast ;-) Multichill (talk) 21:10, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Assigned to Progress Bot name Category


Mineral pictures of Leon Hupperichs on mineralienatlas[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Hello, I need help for uploading all pictures of Leon Hupperichs on Mineralienatlas:. His user page on mineralienatlas is here (435 pictures on 49 pages).

The picture description page should be the same as in the example File:Ravatite-MA1296598364.jpg. User category is Category:Files by Leon Hupperichs. Greetings -- Ra'ike T C 12:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC) P.S.: The other approved pictures of Leon Hupperichs on mindat will be loaded by User:Reinhard Kraasch, because he has all pictures loaded from mindat, when he worked for that old request and he is informed yet for the new one.

Opinions[Quelltext bearbeiten]

Assigned to Progress Bot name Category
Abgerufen von „https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:GLAM/dt.Projekte&oldid=122422375“